<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Democratic Policy &amp; Communications Center | News</title>
		<link>http://www.dpcc.senate.gov/</link>
		<description>Important information from Democratic Policy &amp; Communications Center.</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2013 Democratic Policy &amp; Communications Center</copyright>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 02:58:29 EST</lastBuildDate>

		<item>
			<title>By The Numbers: Border Security, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Act of 2013</title>
			<description>&amp;amp;nbsp;
&amp;amp;nbsp;535


&amp;amp;nbsp;
&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp; Hours to Read the Bill Before   Start of Committee Markup
&amp;amp;nbsp;





&amp;amp;nbsp;163



&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp; Amendments Considered in Committee




&amp;amp;nbsp;
30


&amp;amp;nbsp;
&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp; Republican Amendments Accepted





29+


&amp;amp;nbsp; 
&amp;amp;nbsp; Hours Spent Deliberating in Committee Markup 




&amp;amp;nbsp;
&amp;amp;nbsp;101


&amp;amp;nbsp;
&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp; Days From Introduction of   Bipartisan Framework To Scheduled Committee Markup
&amp;amp;nbsp;




&amp;amp;nbsp;
&amp;amp;nbsp;40


&amp;amp;nbsp;
&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp; Pages You Would Need to Read   Per Day to Finish the Bill Before Scheduled Committee Markup
&amp;amp;nbsp;




&amp;amp;nbsp;
&amp;amp;nbsp;12


&amp;amp;nbsp;
&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp; Full Committee Hearings on   Immigration and Border Security in 2013 Before   Markup
&amp;amp;nbsp;




&amp;amp;nbsp;
&amp;amp;nbsp;42


&amp;amp;nbsp;
&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp; Judiciary Committee Witnesses   on Immigration This Year
&amp;amp;nbsp;




&amp;amp;nbsp;
&amp;amp;nbsp;78% 


&amp;amp;nbsp;
&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp; Republicans&apos; Support for the   Bipartisan Immigration Reform Plan [Winston   Group, 4/25/13]
&amp;amp;nbsp;




&amp;amp;nbsp;
&amp;amp;nbsp;84%&amp;amp;nbsp; 


&amp;amp;nbsp;
&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp; Americans&apos; Support for a Path   to Citizenship [CNN,   4/16/13]
&amp;amp;nbsp;





 
 
 
 
 
 
 
&amp;amp;nbsp;</description>
			<link>http://www.dpcc.senate.gov/?p=blog&amp;id=238</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 20:00:00 EST</pubDate>
			
		</item>
	
		<item>
			<title>Remember? Not Long Ago, Republicans Wanted To Pass a Budget</title>
			<description>SEN. MCCONNELL: PASS A BUDGET THROUGH REGULAR ORDER 
 
 
 
Sen. McConnell (R-KY): &apos;A second term presents the opportunity to do things differently, and in the Senate that means a return to regular order. Later this week, the House plans to send the Senate a bill to address the debt limit in a timely manner. Once we get it, the Senate should quickly respond. If the Senate version is different than the one the House sends over, send it off to conference. That&apos;s how things are supposed to work around here. We used to call it legislating.&apos; [McConnell Floor Remarks, 1/22/13]
 
 
 
Sen. McConnell (R-KY): &apos;Why aren&apos;t we trying to do something about reducing spending? We know we need to do it. When are we going to do it? We don&apos;t need to use the deadlines. We could go through the regular order. Congress could pass bills. They could have conferences between the House and Senate.&apos; [ABC This Week, 1/6/13]
 
 
 
Sen. McConnell (R-KY): &apos;But, in any event, we ought not to ignore the law any longer. And I think it&apos;s a good step in the direction of getting back to regular order, which we ought to follow, it strikes me, most of the time, unless there&apos;s a pretty strong reason not to do that.&apos; [Press Conference, 1/29/13]
 
 
 
REPUBLICANS ASKED AND ASKED AGAIN FOR THE SENATE TO PASS A BUDGET RESOLUTION
 
 
 
Sen. Thune (R-SD): &apos;It all started with the fact that this Chamber has not produced a budget for now 3 years in a row.&apos; [Floor Remarks, 9/13/12]
 
 
 
Sen. Corker (R-TN): &apos;We have not had a budget in this body for 1,240 days.&apos; [Floor Remarks, 9/20/12]
 
 
 
Sen. Cornyn (R-TX):&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&apos;1,387 days since the United States Senate has passed a budget.&apos; [Floor Remarks, 2/14/13]
 
 
 
Sen. Coats (R-IN): &apos;It has been 1,372 days since the United States Senate passed a budget.&apos; [Floor Remarks, 1/30/13]
 
 
 
Sen. Cornyn (R-TX):&amp;amp;nbsp; &apos;But it starts with passing a budget, something Senate Democrats haven&apos;t done for 1,414 days.&apos; [Floor Remarks, 3/13/13]
 
 
 
Sen. Isakson (R-GA): &apos;Let&apos;s get back to the business of America. Let&apos;s get a budget to the floor.&apos; [Floor Remarks, 9/20/12]
 
Sen. McConnell (R-KY): &apos;I don&apos;t think the law says &apos;pass a budget unless it&apos;s hard.&apos; So I think there&apos;s no question that we would -- we would take up our responsibility.&apos; &amp;amp;nbsp;[Press Conference, 1/24/12]
 
 
 
Sen. McConnell (R-KY): &apos;A second term presents the opportunity to do things differently, and in the Senate that means a return to regular order. Later this week, the House plans to send the Senate a bill to address the debt limit in a timely manner. Once we get it, the Senate should quickly respond. If the Senate version is different than the one the House sends over, send it off to conference. That&apos;s how things are supposed to work around here. We used to call it legislating.&apos; [McConnell Floor Remarks, 1/22/13]
 
 
 
Sen. Blunt (R-MO): &apos;These problems are big, but they are not necessarily that complicated. We just have to have the willpower to deal with them. This Congress has not done that. This Senate, more importantly, has not done that. The House has passed bills. The House has passed a budget .&apos; [Floor Remarks, 9/20/12]
 
 
 
BUT NOW, REPUBLICANS ARE STANDING IN THE WAY
 
 
 
Sen. Toomey (R-PA): &apos;Mr. President, the ranking member of the Budget Committee, Senator Sessions, is not available because he has a conflict at the moment. On his behalf, I object.&apos; [Floor Remarks, 4/23/13]
 
 
 
Sen. Cruz (R-TX): &apos;Yes. I object.&apos; [Floor Remarks, 5/6/13] 
Sen. McConnell (R-KY): &apos;I object.&apos; [Floor Remarks, 5/7/13]
 
 
 
Sen. McConnell (R-KY): &apos;I object.&apos; [Floor Remarks, 5/8/13]
 
 
 
Sen. McConnell (R-KY): &apos;I object.&apos; [Floor Remarks, 5/9/13]
Sen. McConnell (R-KY): &apos;I object.&apos; [Floor Remarks, 5/14/13]
Sen. McConnell (R-KY): &apos;I object.&apos; [Floor Remarks, 5/15/13]
Sen. Lee (R-UT): &apos;I object.&apos; [Floor Remarks, 5/16/13]
Sen. Paul (R-KY): &apos;I object.&apos; [Floor Remarks, 5/21/13]</description>
			<link>http://www.dpcc.senate.gov/?p=news&amp;id=239</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 17:15:00 EST</pubDate>
			<enclosure url="http://www.dpcc.senate.gov/files/images/DPCCSenatebudget59.jpg" type="image/jpeg" />
		</item>
	
		<item>
			<title>Immigration Timeline for 2013</title>
			<description></description>
			<link>http://www.dpcc.senate.gov/?p=news&amp;id=240</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 09:45:00 EST</pubDate>
			
		</item>
	
		<item>
			<title>Resumen Del Segundo D&iacute;a: Progreso Bipartidista En Torno A La Reforma Migratoria - #CIRMARKUP</title>
			<description>El&amp;amp;nbsp;Comit&amp;amp;eacute; Judicial del Senado el martes&amp;amp;nbsp;continu&amp;amp;oacute; debatiendo el Proyecto de Ley Para la Seguridad Fronteriza, Oportunidades&amp;amp;nbsp;Econ&amp;amp;oacute;micas y&amp;amp;nbsp;Modernizaci&amp;amp;oacute;n Migratoria del 2013.&amp;amp;nbsp;  El debate&amp;amp;nbsp;comenz&amp;amp;oacute; a las 10:00 a.m.,&amp;amp;nbsp;y&amp;amp;nbsp;concluy&amp;amp;oacute; a&amp;amp;nbsp;las&amp;amp;nbsp;5:10 p.m.  Durante la&amp;amp;nbsp;Sesi&amp;amp;oacute;n del Martes el&amp;amp;nbsp;Comit&amp;amp;eacute;&amp;amp;nbsp;consider&amp;amp;oacute; un total de 38 enmiendas.&amp;amp;nbsp;  Casi la mitad de las enmiendas consideradas fueron propuestas por republicanos. De las 38 enmiendas, 24 fueron aceptadas, todas --a&amp;amp;nbsp;excepci&amp;amp;oacute;n de una-- con apoyo bipartidista.  El jueves, 9 de mayo, se discutieron 35 enmiendas.
 
Un Enfoque Sobre las Necesidades&amp;amp;nbsp;Laborales del Pa&amp;amp;iacute;s
 
 
El martes, el&amp;amp;nbsp;Comit&amp;amp;eacute;&amp;amp;nbsp;concluy&amp;amp;oacute; la&amp;amp;nbsp;consideraci&amp;amp;oacute;n de la&amp;amp;nbsp;secci&amp;amp;oacute;n pre-T&amp;amp;iacute;tulo I del proyecto de ley (seguridad fronteriza),&amp;amp;nbsp;y enseguida&amp;amp;nbsp;inici&amp;amp;oacute; la&amp;amp;nbsp;consideraci&amp;amp;oacute;n del T&amp;amp;iacute;tulo IV, que comprende visas de no-inmigrantes.&amp;amp;nbsp;El&amp;amp;nbsp;Comit&amp;amp;eacute;&amp;amp;nbsp;consider&amp;amp;oacute; enmiendas para fortalecer y mejorar los programas H-1B y aquel conocido como programa&amp;amp;nbsp;de visas STEM (para personas con habilidades en ciencias, matem&amp;amp;aacute;ticas,&amp;amp;nbsp;ingenier&amp;amp;iacute;a y tecnolog&amp;amp;iacute;a) para atraer a la&amp;amp;nbsp;econom&amp;amp;iacute;a estadounidense mano de obra altamente calificada&amp;amp;nbsp;y promover&amp;amp;nbsp;innovaci&amp;amp;oacute;n en el pa&amp;amp;iacute;s.&amp;amp;nbsp;El&amp;amp;nbsp;Comit&amp;amp;eacute;&amp;amp;nbsp;rechaz&amp;amp;oacute; intentos para&amp;amp;nbsp;restringir seriamente la&amp;amp;nbsp;inmigraci&amp;amp;oacute;n legal, lo cual hubiese obstaculizado la habilidad de los empleadores de cumplir con sus metas de&amp;amp;nbsp;contrataci&amp;amp;oacute;n de personal.
 
 
Durante la&amp;amp;nbsp;sesi&amp;amp;oacute;n del martes, el&amp;amp;nbsp;Comit&amp;amp;eacute;&amp;amp;nbsp;tambi&amp;amp;eacute;n&amp;amp;nbsp;adopt&amp;amp;oacute; enmiendas para cerrar brechas en el programa de visas estudiantiles,&amp;amp;nbsp;mientras que a la vez se&amp;amp;nbsp;proteg&amp;amp;iacute;an las&amp;amp;nbsp;v&amp;amp;iacute;as para que los estudiantes&amp;amp;nbsp;extranjeros&amp;amp;nbsp;leg&amp;amp;iacute;timos pudieran continuar sus estudios en los Estados Unidos.&amp;amp;nbsp; El&amp;amp;nbsp;Comit&amp;amp;eacute;&amp;amp;nbsp;tambi&amp;amp;eacute;n&amp;amp;nbsp;adopt&amp;amp;oacute; medidas para evitar fraude con el programa de visas H-1B al establecer requisitos de auditoria.
 
A&amp;amp;nbsp;Continuaci&amp;amp;oacute;n una Lista en&amp;amp;nbsp;Ingl&amp;amp;eacute;s de las Enmiendas Adoptadas el Martes
 
 
*NOTE:&amp;amp;nbsp;Summaries&amp;amp;nbsp;reflect&amp;amp;nbsp;purpose&amp;amp;nbsp;statements&amp;amp;nbsp;included in&amp;amp;nbsp;the&amp;amp;nbsp;proposed amendment.
 
 
Feinstein11&amp;amp;nbsp;(as amended) -&amp;amp;nbsp;To&amp;amp;nbsp;modify&amp;amp;nbsp;the&amp;amp;nbsp;extent of&amp;amp;nbsp;the&amp;amp;nbsp;Southwest&amp;amp;nbsp;border&amp;amp;nbsp;region&amp;amp;nbsp;for&amp;amp;nbsp;purposes of&amp;amp;nbsp;border&amp;amp;nbsp;security -&amp;amp;nbsp;Adopted&amp;amp;nbsp;by&amp;amp;nbsp;Voice Vote
 
Coons2&amp;amp;nbsp;(as amended) -&amp;amp;nbsp;To&amp;amp;nbsp;limit&amp;amp;nbsp;dangerous&amp;amp;nbsp;deportation&amp;amp;nbsp;practices -&amp;amp;nbsp;Adopted&amp;amp;nbsp;by&amp;amp;nbsp;Voice Vote
 
Schumer1&amp;amp;nbsp;-&amp;amp;nbsp;To&amp;amp;nbsp;make&amp;amp;nbsp;technical&amp;amp;nbsp;amendments -&amp;amp;nbsp;Adopted&amp;amp;nbsp;by&amp;amp;nbsp;Voice Vote
 
Sessions4&amp;amp;nbsp;-&amp;amp;nbsp;To&amp;amp;nbsp;require&amp;amp;nbsp;the use of a&amp;amp;nbsp;biometric&amp;amp;nbsp;entry and&amp;amp;nbsp;exit data&amp;amp;nbsp;system at&amp;amp;nbsp;ports of&amp;amp;nbsp;entry&amp;amp;nbsp;before&amp;amp;nbsp;the&amp;amp;nbsp;Secretary of&amp;amp;nbsp;Homeland Security&amp;amp;nbsp;may&amp;amp;nbsp;adjust&amp;amp;nbsp;the status of&amp;amp;nbsp;aliens&amp;amp;nbsp;who&amp;amp;nbsp;have&amp;amp;nbsp;been&amp;amp;nbsp;granted&amp;amp;nbsp;registered provisional&amp;amp;nbsp;immigrant status - Vote: 6-12 (Not&amp;amp;nbsp;Agreed To)
 
Lee1&amp;amp;nbsp;- In&amp;amp;nbsp;the&amp;amp;nbsp;nature of a&amp;amp;nbsp;substitute - Withdrawn
 
Lee2&amp;amp;nbsp;- In&amp;amp;nbsp;the&amp;amp;nbsp;nature of a&amp;amp;nbsp;substitute - Withdrawn
 
Lee3&amp;amp;nbsp;- In&amp;amp;nbsp;the&amp;amp;nbsp;nature of a&amp;amp;nbsp;substitute - Withdrawn
 
Sessions1&amp;amp;nbsp;-&amp;amp;nbsp;To&amp;amp;nbsp;provide&amp;amp;nbsp;for&amp;amp;nbsp;future&amp;amp;nbsp;immigration and&amp;amp;nbsp;limit&amp;amp;nbsp;the&amp;amp;nbsp;number of&amp;amp;nbsp;nonimmigrant&amp;amp;nbsp;aliens&amp;amp;nbsp;who&amp;amp;nbsp;may&amp;amp;nbsp;be&amp;amp;nbsp;authorized&amp;amp;nbsp;for&amp;amp;nbsp;employment in&amp;amp;nbsp;the&amp;amp;nbsp;United&amp;amp;nbsp;States - Vote: 1-17 (Not&amp;amp;nbsp;Agreed To)
 
Whitehouse6&amp;amp;nbsp;(as amended) -&amp;amp;nbsp;To&amp;amp;nbsp;modify&amp;amp;nbsp;provisions&amp;amp;nbsp;related&amp;amp;nbsp;to&amp;amp;nbsp;complaints&amp;amp;nbsp;against H-1B&amp;amp;nbsp;employers -&amp;amp;nbsp;Adopted&amp;amp;nbsp;by&amp;amp;nbsp;Voice Vote
 
Grassley58&amp;amp;nbsp;-&amp;amp;nbsp;To&amp;amp;nbsp;require&amp;amp;nbsp;additional&amp;amp;nbsp;information in Internet&amp;amp;nbsp;job&amp;amp;nbsp;postings&amp;amp;nbsp;for&amp;amp;nbsp;nonimmigrant&amp;amp;nbsp;employment in&amp;amp;nbsp;connection&amp;amp;nbsp;with&amp;amp;nbsp;the&amp;amp;nbsp;issuance of H-1B visas -&amp;amp;nbsp;Adopted&amp;amp;nbsp;by&amp;amp;nbsp;Voice Vote
 
Hatch9&amp;amp;nbsp;(as amended) -&amp;amp;nbsp;To&amp;amp;nbsp;increase&amp;amp;nbsp;the labor&amp;amp;nbsp;certification&amp;amp;nbsp;fee&amp;amp;nbsp;required&amp;amp;nbsp;under&amp;amp;nbsp;section 212(a)(5)(A) of&amp;amp;nbsp;the&amp;amp;nbsp;Immigration and&amp;amp;nbsp;Nationality&amp;amp;nbsp;Act and&amp;amp;nbsp;to use&amp;amp;nbsp;these&amp;amp;nbsp;fees&amp;amp;nbsp;to&amp;amp;nbsp;enhance&amp;amp;nbsp;the&amp;amp;nbsp;economic&amp;amp;nbsp;competitiveness of&amp;amp;nbsp;the&amp;amp;nbsp;United&amp;amp;nbsp;States&amp;amp;nbsp;by&amp;amp;nbsp;improving science, technology, engineering, and&amp;amp;nbsp;mathematics&amp;amp;nbsp;education and training in&amp;amp;nbsp;the&amp;amp;nbsp;United&amp;amp;nbsp;States -&amp;amp;nbsp;Adopted&amp;amp;nbsp;by&amp;amp;nbsp;Voice Vote
 
Grassley67&amp;amp;nbsp;-&amp;amp;nbsp;To&amp;amp;nbsp;require&amp;amp;nbsp;audits of&amp;amp;nbsp;additional&amp;amp;nbsp;audits of&amp;amp;nbsp;employers&amp;amp;nbsp;employing H-1B&amp;amp;nbsp;nonimmigrants and L&amp;amp;nbsp;nonimmigrants - Vote: 2-15-1
 
Cruz5&amp;amp;nbsp;-&amp;amp;nbsp;To&amp;amp;nbsp;amend&amp;amp;nbsp;the&amp;amp;nbsp;provisions in&amp;amp;nbsp;the&amp;amp;nbsp;Immigration and&amp;amp;nbsp;Nationality&amp;amp;nbsp;Act&amp;amp;nbsp;relating o&amp;amp;nbsp;the&amp;amp;nbsp;numerical&amp;amp;nbsp;limitations&amp;amp;nbsp;for H-1B&amp;amp;nbsp;nonimmigrants - Vote: 4-14 (Not&amp;amp;nbsp;Agree To)
 
Grassley60&amp;amp;nbsp;-&amp;amp;nbsp;To&amp;amp;nbsp;provide&amp;amp;nbsp;that&amp;amp;nbsp;the&amp;amp;nbsp;good&amp;amp;nbsp;faith&amp;amp;nbsp;efforts&amp;amp;nbsp;to&amp;amp;nbsp;recruit in&amp;amp;nbsp;the&amp;amp;nbsp;United&amp;amp;nbsp;States&amp;amp;nbsp;apply&amp;amp;nbsp;to&amp;amp;nbsp;all&amp;amp;nbsp;employers in&amp;amp;nbsp;connection&amp;amp;nbsp;with&amp;amp;nbsp;the&amp;amp;nbsp;issuance of H-1B visas - Vote: 2-15-1 (Not&amp;amp;nbsp;Agreed To)
 
Grassley62&amp;amp;nbsp;-&amp;amp;nbsp;To strike&amp;amp;nbsp;provisions&amp;amp;nbsp;relating&amp;amp;nbsp;to&amp;amp;nbsp;intending&amp;amp;nbsp;immigrants in&amp;amp;nbsp;connection&amp;amp;nbsp;with&amp;amp;nbsp;the&amp;amp;nbsp;issuance of H-1B visas - Vote: 2-15-1 (Not&amp;amp;nbsp;Agreed To)
 
Grassley56&amp;amp;nbsp;-&amp;amp;nbsp;To strike&amp;amp;nbsp;the&amp;amp;nbsp;authority&amp;amp;nbsp;relating&amp;amp;nbsp;to interview&amp;amp;nbsp;waivers&amp;amp;nbsp;for&amp;amp;nbsp;low&amp;amp;nbsp;risk visa&amp;amp;nbsp;applicants - Vote: 9-9 (Not&amp;amp;nbsp;Agreed To)
 
Schumer3&amp;amp;nbsp;-&amp;amp;nbsp;To&amp;amp;nbsp;make&amp;amp;nbsp;certain&amp;amp;nbsp;nationals of&amp;amp;nbsp;countries&amp;amp;nbsp;that&amp;amp;nbsp;benefit&amp;amp;nbsp;from&amp;amp;nbsp;the&amp;amp;nbsp;African&amp;amp;nbsp;Growth and&amp;amp;nbsp;Opportunity&amp;amp;nbsp;Act of&amp;amp;nbsp;the&amp;amp;nbsp;Caribbean&amp;amp;nbsp;Basin&amp;amp;nbsp;Economic&amp;amp;nbsp;Recovery&amp;amp;nbsp;Act&amp;amp;nbsp;eligible&amp;amp;nbsp;for E&amp;amp;nbsp;nonimmigrant visas -&amp;amp;nbsp;Adopted&amp;amp;nbsp;by&amp;amp;nbsp;Voice Vote
 
Grassley70&amp;amp;nbsp;-&amp;amp;nbsp;To&amp;amp;nbsp;delay&amp;amp;nbsp;the&amp;amp;nbsp;issuance of E-5 Visas&amp;amp;nbsp;to&amp;amp;nbsp;nationals of South&amp;amp;nbsp;Korea&amp;amp;nbsp;until South&amp;amp;nbsp;Korea has&amp;amp;nbsp;fully removed&amp;amp;nbsp;age-based&amp;amp;nbsp;import&amp;amp;nbsp;restrictions&amp;amp;nbsp;on&amp;amp;nbsp;beef&amp;amp;nbsp;from&amp;amp;nbsp;the&amp;amp;nbsp;United&amp;amp;nbsp;States -&amp;amp;nbsp;Not&amp;amp;nbsp;Agreed&amp;amp;nbsp;to&amp;amp;nbsp;by&amp;amp;nbsp;Voice Vote
 
Klobuchar&amp;amp;nbsp;3 -&amp;amp;nbsp;To&amp;amp;nbsp;require a&amp;amp;nbsp;pilot&amp;amp;nbsp;program&amp;amp;nbsp;to&amp;amp;nbsp;conduct interviews&amp;amp;nbsp;for&amp;amp;nbsp;certain&amp;amp;nbsp;nonimmigrant visas&amp;amp;nbsp;using&amp;amp;nbsp;secure&amp;amp;nbsp;remote video&amp;amp;nbsp;conferencing&amp;amp;nbsp;technology -&amp;amp;nbsp;Adopted&amp;amp;nbsp;by&amp;amp;nbsp;Voice Vote
 
Sessions13&amp;amp;nbsp;(as amended) -&amp;amp;nbsp;To&amp;amp;nbsp;require&amp;amp;nbsp;aliens&amp;amp;nbsp;who&amp;amp;nbsp;may&amp;amp;nbsp;be a&amp;amp;nbsp;threat&amp;amp;nbsp;to&amp;amp;nbsp;national&amp;amp;nbsp;security&amp;amp;nbsp;to&amp;amp;nbsp;submit&amp;amp;nbsp;to&amp;amp;nbsp;an in&amp;amp;nbsp;person interview&amp;amp;nbsp;with a consular&amp;amp;nbsp;officer&amp;amp;nbsp;when&amp;amp;nbsp;applying&amp;amp;nbsp;for a visa - Vote: 10-8 (Agreed To)
 
Blumenthal17&amp;amp;nbsp;-&amp;amp;nbsp;To&amp;amp;nbsp;strengthen&amp;amp;nbsp;the&amp;amp;nbsp;whistleblower&amp;amp;nbsp;protections&amp;amp;nbsp;for H-2B&amp;amp;nbsp;nonimmigrants - Withdrawn
 
Hirono15&amp;amp;nbsp;-&amp;amp;nbsp;To&amp;amp;nbsp;permit&amp;amp;nbsp;Medicaid&amp;amp;nbsp;coverage&amp;amp;nbsp;for&amp;amp;nbsp;citizens of&amp;amp;nbsp;the&amp;amp;nbsp;Freely&amp;amp;nbsp;Associated&amp;amp;nbsp;States -&amp;amp;nbsp;Adopted&amp;amp;nbsp;by&amp;amp;nbsp;Voice Vote
 
Grassley&amp;amp;nbsp;69 (as amended) -&amp;amp;nbsp;To&amp;amp;nbsp;improve&amp;amp;nbsp;student and&amp;amp;nbsp;exchange&amp;amp;nbsp;visitor visa&amp;amp;nbsp;programs -&amp;amp;nbsp;Adopted&amp;amp;nbsp;by&amp;amp;nbsp;Voice Vote
 
Schumer4&amp;amp;nbsp;(as amended) -&amp;amp;nbsp;To&amp;amp;nbsp;permit&amp;amp;nbsp;aliens&amp;amp;nbsp;with&amp;amp;nbsp;proficiency in&amp;amp;nbsp;certain&amp;amp;nbsp;foreign&amp;amp;nbsp;languages&amp;amp;nbsp;to&amp;amp;nbsp;qualify as J&amp;amp;nbsp;nonimmigrants -&amp;amp;nbsp;Agreed&amp;amp;nbsp;to&amp;amp;nbsp;by&amp;amp;nbsp;Voice Vote 
 
Sessions6&amp;amp;nbsp;-&amp;amp;nbsp;To&amp;amp;nbsp;prevent&amp;amp;nbsp;amendments&amp;amp;nbsp;to&amp;amp;nbsp;the visa&amp;amp;nbsp;waiver&amp;amp;nbsp;program&amp;amp;nbsp;from&amp;amp;nbsp;taking&amp;amp;nbsp;effect&amp;amp;nbsp;until&amp;amp;nbsp;the&amp;amp;nbsp;biometric&amp;amp;nbsp;entry and&amp;amp;nbsp;exit data&amp;amp;nbsp;system&amp;amp;nbsp;described in&amp;amp;nbsp;section 7208 of&amp;amp;nbsp;the 9/11&amp;amp;nbsp;Commission&amp;amp;nbsp;Implementation&amp;amp;nbsp;Act of 2004 has&amp;amp;nbsp;been&amp;amp;nbsp;fully&amp;amp;nbsp;implemented and&amp;amp;nbsp;to strike&amp;amp;nbsp;the&amp;amp;nbsp;amendments&amp;amp;nbsp;to&amp;amp;nbsp;the&amp;amp;nbsp;waiver&amp;amp;nbsp;provision - Vote: 6-12 (Not&amp;amp;nbsp;Agreed To)
 
Klobuchar1&amp;amp;nbsp;-&amp;amp;nbsp;To&amp;amp;nbsp;provide&amp;amp;nbsp;immigration status&amp;amp;nbsp;for&amp;amp;nbsp;certain&amp;amp;nbsp;battered&amp;amp;nbsp;spouses and&amp;amp;nbsp;children -&amp;amp;nbsp;Adopted&amp;amp;nbsp;by&amp;amp;nbsp;Voice Vote
 
Grassley77&amp;amp;nbsp;-&amp;amp;nbsp;To&amp;amp;nbsp;require&amp;amp;nbsp;the&amp;amp;nbsp;Secretary&amp;amp;nbsp;to&amp;amp;nbsp;implement&amp;amp;nbsp;the&amp;amp;nbsp;transmission of data&amp;amp;nbsp;from&amp;amp;nbsp;the&amp;amp;nbsp;Student and Exchange&amp;amp;nbsp;Visitor&amp;amp;nbsp;Information&amp;amp;nbsp;System&amp;amp;nbsp;to&amp;amp;nbsp;databases&amp;amp;nbsp;used&amp;amp;nbsp;by&amp;amp;nbsp;U.S.&amp;amp;nbsp;Customs and&amp;amp;nbsp;Border&amp;amp;nbsp;Protection -&amp;amp;nbsp;Adopted&amp;amp;nbsp;by&amp;amp;nbsp;Voice Vote
 
Hirono2&amp;amp;nbsp;-&amp;amp;nbsp;To&amp;amp;nbsp;amend&amp;amp;nbsp;the&amp;amp;nbsp;Immigration and&amp;amp;nbsp;Nationality&amp;amp;nbsp;Act&amp;amp;nbsp;to&amp;amp;nbsp;permit&amp;amp;nbsp;nonimmigrant&amp;amp;nbsp;alien&amp;amp;nbsp;crewman&amp;amp;nbsp;to&amp;amp;nbsp;land&amp;amp;nbsp;temporarily in&amp;amp;nbsp;Hawaii -&amp;amp;nbsp;Adopted&amp;amp;nbsp;by&amp;amp;nbsp;Voice Vote
 
Grassley68&amp;amp;nbsp;-&amp;amp;nbsp;To&amp;amp;nbsp;delay&amp;amp;nbsp;the&amp;amp;nbsp;effectiveness of&amp;amp;nbsp;the&amp;amp;nbsp;provisions&amp;amp;nbsp;on dual&amp;amp;nbsp;intent&amp;amp;nbsp;for F&amp;amp;nbsp;nonimmigrants&amp;amp;nbsp;seeking&amp;amp;nbsp;higher&amp;amp;nbsp;degree&amp;amp;nbsp;until&amp;amp;nbsp;the&amp;amp;nbsp;deployment of&amp;amp;nbsp;the&amp;amp;nbsp;2nd&amp;amp;nbsp;generation&amp;amp;nbsp;Student and Exchange&amp;amp;nbsp;Visitor&amp;amp;nbsp;Information System. - Vote: 9-9 (Not&amp;amp;nbsp;Agreed To)
 
 
El Debate&amp;amp;nbsp;Continuar&amp;amp;aacute; el Jueves 16 de mayo a las 9:30 a.m.
 
 El&amp;amp;nbsp;Comit&amp;amp;eacute;&amp;amp;nbsp;concluy&amp;amp;oacute; la&amp;amp;nbsp;consideraci&amp;amp;oacute;n del Pre-T&amp;amp;iacute;tulo y el&amp;amp;nbsp;T&amp;amp;iacute;tulo I, y&amp;amp;nbsp;logr&amp;amp;oacute; buen progreso en torno al&amp;amp;nbsp;T&amp;amp;iacute;tulo IV.&amp;amp;nbsp;El Presidente del&amp;amp;nbsp;Comit&amp;amp;eacute; Patrick&amp;amp;nbsp;Leahy&amp;amp;nbsp;anunci&amp;amp;oacute; hoy que el&amp;amp;nbsp;Comit&amp;amp;eacute;&amp;amp;nbsp;continuar&amp;amp;aacute; el proceso con el&amp;amp;nbsp; Proyecto de Ley para La Seguridad Fronteriza, Oportunidad Econ&amp;amp;oacute;mica, y&amp;amp;nbsp;Modernizaci&amp;amp;oacute;n Migratoria el jueves 16 de mayo a las 9:30 a.m.&amp;amp;nbsp; El&amp;amp;nbsp;Comit&amp;amp;eacute;&amp;amp;nbsp;finalizar&amp;amp;aacute; el trabajo en torno al T&amp;amp;iacute;tulo IV el jueves, y de&amp;amp;nbsp;ah&amp;amp;iacute;&amp;amp;nbsp;pasar&amp;amp;aacute; al T&amp;amp;iacute;tulo III,&amp;amp;nbsp;iniciando el debate en torno a las enmiendas de E-Verify.&amp;amp;nbsp; Se espera que el&amp;amp;nbsp;Comit&amp;amp;eacute;&amp;amp;nbsp;contin&amp;amp;uacute;e trabajando el viernes.</description>
			<link>http://www.dpcc.senate.gov/?p=news&amp;id=245</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 10:04:00 EST</pubDate>
			
		</item>
	
		<item>
			<title>La Reforma Migratoria Fortalece A Nuestra Econom&iacute;a - #CIRMARKUP</title>
			<description>Durante el debate de hoy, el Senador Sessions propuso una enmienda (Sessions 1) que limitar&amp;amp;iacute;a severamente el n&amp;amp;uacute;mero de inmigrantes a quienes se les permitir&amp;amp;iacute;a entrar al pa&amp;amp;iacute;s. El Senador Sessions ha repetidamente dado cifras falsas y exageradas las cuales indican que el proyecto de reforma migratoria bipartidista resultar&amp;amp;iacute;a en la admisi&amp;amp;oacute;n de hasta 30 millones nuevos inmigrantes en un futuro.
 
Cifras Exageradas de Futuros Inmigrantes
 
El Senador Sessions enga&amp;amp;ntilde;osamente incrementa sus cifras al incluir a los 11 millones de inmigrantes indocumentados que ya est&amp;amp;aacute;n aqu&amp;amp;iacute; y tuvieran que ganarse su residencia legal si pagan impuestos retroactivos, cuotas, y demuestran que no tienen antecedentes penales. Una reforma migratoria traer&amp;amp;iacute;a a estas personas a nuestro sistema legal para que puedan pagar impuestos y contribuyan a nuestra econom&amp;amp;iacute;a.
 
Las cifras del Senador Session tambi&amp;amp;eacute;n enga&amp;amp;ntilde;osamente incluyen a los 4,5 millones de inmigrantes quienes han obedecido las leyes y est&amp;amp;aacute;n esperando su turno. Estos son individuos que han calificado para recibir su residencia permanente sin la necesidad de una reforma migratoria, y han estado esperando por varios a&amp;amp;ntilde;os o hasta d&amp;amp;eacute;cadas para venir a nuestro pa&amp;amp;iacute;s.
 
&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp; Flujo Real de &amp;amp;nbsp;Inmigrantes Futuros &amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp; 
 
De acuerdo con el Centro para el Progreso Americano, el proyecto de ley migratoria bipartidista mantendr&amp;amp;iacute;a la inmigraci&amp;amp;oacute;n por los niveles actuales, y posiblemente los reducir&amp;amp;iacute;a por 150,000.
 
En Conclusi&amp;amp;oacute;n: La Reforma Migratoria Fortalecer&amp;amp;aacute; A Nuestra Econom&amp;amp;iacute;a
 
El incremento de capital humano beneficiar&amp;amp;aacute; a nuestra econom&amp;amp;iacute;a, y no la da&amp;amp;ntilde;ar&amp;amp;aacute;. El presidente conservador del grupo de Estadounidenses por una Reforma Fiscal Grover Norquist, dijo que &apos;Las personas son un beneficio, no una carga... Aquellos quienes quieren hacernos menos amigables hacia los inmigrantes nos har&amp;amp;iacute;an menos exitosos, menos pr&amp;amp;oacute;speros, y menos Americanos.&apos;</description>
			<link>http://www.dpcc.senate.gov/?p=news&amp;id=244</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 09:57:00 EST</pubDate>
			
		</item>
	
		<item>
			<title>Schumer: Comite Del Senado Acepta Ocho Enmiendas Republicanas A La Reforma Migratoria, Fortaleciendo La Seguridad Fronteriza Y La Supervision De Esta</title>
			<description>Un Cambio al Proyecto Original del Sen.Grassley Aplicar&amp;amp;iacute;a las Metas de Seguridad Fronteriza a Todos los Sectores de la Frontera -No Solo&amp;amp;nbsp;los Sectores de Alto Riesgo
 
 
 
Schumer: &apos;Planeamos Incluir M&amp;amp;aacute;s Enmiendas Republicanas en los Pr&amp;amp;oacute;ximos D&amp;amp;iacute;as, a Medida que Continua el Debate&apos;
 
 
WASHINGTON, DC-El Senador Federal Charles E. Schumer (D-NY) aplaudi&amp;amp;oacute; el jueves las ocho enmiendas republicanas que fueron incorporadas en el proyecto de ley bipartidista del Senado, durante el primer d&amp;amp;iacute;a de debate en el Comit&amp;amp;eacute; Judicial. Los cambios se enfocan en mejoras a la supervisi&amp;amp;oacute;n del Congreso y el fortalecimiento de las medidas de la seguridad fronteriza dentro del proyecto.
 
 
&apos;Estas son mejoras con buenas intenciones que fortalecen la propuesta. Nuestro plan es continuar aceptando todas las enmiendas republicanas que podamos. El Presidente del Comit&amp;amp;eacute; Leahy ha liderado un proceso extremadamente abierto e inclusivo. Esta es la manera en que debe trabajar el Senado&apos;, dijo Schumer, quien es el presidente del Sub-Comit&amp;amp;eacute; de Inmigraci&amp;amp;oacute;n del Senado, y uno de los autores principales de la propuesta del Senado.
 
 
Cuatro de las enmiendas republicanas aceptadas el jueves fueron introducidas por el Sen. Charles Grassley, el republicano de m&amp;amp;aacute;s alto rango en Comit&amp;amp;eacute; Judicial del Senado. Una de las propuestas de Grassley requiere aplicar las metas de seguridad fronteriza a toda la frontera del Suroeste. La versi&amp;amp;oacute;n original de la propuesta del Senado se enfocaba en &amp;amp;aacute;reas de la frontera de&amp;amp;nbsp;&apos;alto riesgo&apos; donde se registran m&amp;amp;aacute;s de 30.000 detenciones al a&amp;amp;ntilde;o.
 
 
A continuaci&amp;amp;oacute;n algunas de la ocho enmiendas republicanas incorporadas el jueves:
 
Grassley2 -&amp;amp;nbsp;Agrega los Comit&amp;amp;eacute;s Judiciales del Senado y la C&amp;amp;aacute;mara&amp;amp;nbsp;a la lista de comit&amp;amp;eacute;s y agencias que reciben reportes regulares sobre el estado de la seguridad fronteriza.
 
 
Grassley5 - Requiere&amp;amp;nbsp;que el&amp;amp;nbsp;Ejecutivo Financiero del Departamento de Seguridad Nacional&amp;amp;nbsp;presente un reporte anual de auditor&amp;amp;iacute;as financieras en torno al Fondos para la Reforma Migratoria Integral.&amp;amp;nbsp; 
 
 
Sessions36 -&amp;amp;nbsp;Ampl&amp;amp;iacute;a las funciones del Ombudsman del Servicio de Ciudadan&amp;amp;iacute;a e Inmigraci&amp;amp;oacute;n de Estados Unidos, USCIS por sus siglas en ingl&amp;amp;eacute;s para que incluya ayuda a las familias que han sido v&amp;amp;iacute;ctimas de cr&amp;amp;iacute;menes cometidos por indocumentados, o v&amp;amp;iacute;ctimas de violencia, cerca de la frontera de Estados Unidos.
 
 
Cornyn6 - Agrega tipos de tr&amp;amp;aacute;fico humano severos a la lista de cr&amp;amp;iacute;menes violentos que debe&amp;amp;nbsp;reportar el FBI.
 
 
Flake1 - Incrementa el n&amp;amp;uacute;mero de miembros en el Equipo de Trabajo para Supervisi&amp;amp;oacute;n de Seguridad Nacional de 26&amp;amp;nbsp;a 29 y as&amp;amp;iacute; poder incluir a 3 representantes de propiedades privadas. Un miembro representar&amp;amp;iacute;a la frontera norte y dos representar&amp;amp;iacute;an la&amp;amp;nbsp;regi&amp;amp;oacute;n de la frontera sur.
 
 
Flake 2 - Substituye reportes mensuales con&amp;amp;nbsp; reportes con fechas l&amp;amp;iacute;mite cada 180 d&amp;amp;iacute;as. A&amp;amp;ntilde;ade que esos reportes sean entregados al administrador general. A&amp;amp;ntilde;ade una directriz para que el administrador general revise los reportes cada seis meses y emitan un reporte del estatus y el progreso de la estrategia de seguridad de la Frontera Sur a los comit&amp;amp;eacute;s del Congreso se&amp;amp;ntilde;alados en la secci&amp;amp;oacute;n 5.
 
 
Grassley1-Aplica&amp;amp;nbsp;las metas de seguridad&amp;amp;nbsp;a todos los&amp;amp;nbsp;sectores de la frontera, no solo&amp;amp;nbsp;los sectores de&amp;amp;nbsp;&apos;alto riesgo&apos; definidos como aquellos en los que se registran m&amp;amp;iacute;nimo 30.000 detenciones.
 
 
Grassley24 - Requiere auditorias anuales para entidades que reciban subvenciones bajo esta ley para evitar fraude, abuso, y el mal uso de los fondos. Proh&amp;amp;iacute;be que estas organizaciones sin fines de lucro depositen los fondos en el extranjero.</description>
			<link>http://www.dpcc.senate.gov/?p=news&amp;id=243</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 18:30:00 EST</pubDate>
			
		</item>
	
		<item>
			<title>Declaraciones De Apertura Del Senador Charles E. Schumer Sobre El Debate Del Proyecto De Ley Para La Seguridad Fronteriza, Oportunidades Econ&oacute;micas Y Modernizaci&oacute;n Migratoria, S.744</title>
			<description>Gracias Se&amp;amp;ntilde;or Presidente. Primero que nada quiero agradecerle por darnos tiempo aqu&amp;amp;iacute; y por demostrar gran liderazgo al proceder con esta legislaci&amp;amp;oacute;n. 
 
 
El Grupo de los 8 - cuatro de nosotros quienes somos miembros de este comit&amp;amp;eacute;, junto con la Senadora Feinstein y el Senador Hatch -&amp;amp;nbsp; le hemos dedicado bastante tiempo a este proyecto de ley y creemos que este proyecto es bueno, balanceado, y robusto ahora emprender&amp;amp;aacute; su camino. Juzgamos que hemos tomado las consideraciones necesarias y hemos&amp;amp;nbsp;escrito un proyecto justo en el cual nadie&amp;amp;nbsp;obtiene todo lo que quiere, pero al final de cuentas significar&amp;amp;aacute; una mejora dram&amp;amp;aacute;tica para nuestra econom&amp;amp;iacute;a, los estadounidenses, y sincronizar&amp;amp;aacute; a nuestras leyes migratorias con lo que es bueno para los trabajadores estadounidenses. 
 
 
Y quiero decirle a mis colegas aqu&amp;amp;iacute;, que nuestras acciones est&amp;amp;aacute;n fundadas en este punto fundamental: los estadounidenses quieren soluciones para la migraci&amp;amp;oacute;n&amp;amp;nbsp;futura, y para sacar de las sombras a los 11 millones de indocumentados quienes viven en el pa&amp;amp;iacute;s, solo si est&amp;amp;aacute;n convencidos que no habr&amp;amp;aacute; nuevas olas de inmigrantes. 
 
 
Este proyecto es el proyecto de ley m&amp;amp;aacute;s robusto que se ha&amp;amp;nbsp;presentado, con una alta probabilidad de ser aprobado y que parar&amp;amp;aacute; el flujo de la inmigraci&amp;amp;oacute;n ilegal - tan solo en la frontera. El Senador McCain y yo patrocinamos una enmienda hace unos a&amp;amp;ntilde;os que invirti&amp;amp;oacute; cerca de $600 a $800 millones en la frontera y la efectividad subi&amp;amp;oacute; de 68 a 82 por ciento. Invertimos mucho m&amp;amp;aacute;s - hasta $6.500 millones de d&amp;amp;oacute;lares. La frontera se cerrar&amp;amp;aacute; efectivamente con esta inversi&amp;amp;oacute;n.
 
 
Tomamos en consideraci&amp;amp;oacute;n&amp;amp;nbsp;la inmigraci&amp;amp;oacute;n futura y nos aseguramos que las industrias con dificultades laborales reciban la ayuda que necesitan. Google mud&amp;amp;oacute; a 400 ingenieros a Vancouver&amp;amp;nbsp; que trabajan con Google Maps porque las leyes de inmigraci&amp;amp;oacute;n Canadienses permitieron a estos ingenieros entrar a su pa&amp;amp;iacute;s. Google no pudo traerlos aqu&amp;amp;iacute;. Al mismo tiempo, en el Estado de Nueva York, el productor de col m&amp;amp;aacute;s grande del estado, el Se&amp;amp;ntilde;or Yunker del Condado de Ontario, no cosech&amp;amp;oacute; miles de acres de col este a&amp;amp;ntilde;o porque no consigui&amp;amp;oacute; suficientes trabajadores agr&amp;amp;iacute;colas. 
 
 
Debemos cambiar nuestras leyes para que las personas que puedan fortalecer a nuestra econom&amp;amp;iacute;a vengan a nuestro pa&amp;amp;iacute;s. Y al mismo tiempo debemos recalcar que cuando las familias est&amp;amp;aacute;n separadas, lo m&amp;amp;aacute;s ben&amp;amp;eacute;volo que podemos hacer es reunificarlas. Y porque podemos parar el flujo de inmigrantes dram&amp;amp;aacute;ticamente, debemos hacer las dos cosas. Y los haremos, y lo haremos de manera justa. 
 
Sabemos que nuestro sistema de migraci&amp;amp;oacute;n actual est&amp;amp;aacute; roto, y sabemos que el estatus quo es inaceptable, pero tambi&amp;amp;eacute;n sabemos que hay muchos que quieren descarrilar este proyecto. Le pido a mis colegas, que si no est&amp;amp;aacute;n de acuerdo con todo, nadie lo est&amp;amp;aacute;. Sean constructivos. Estamos abiertos a editar esta versi&amp;amp;oacute;n. Pero no descarrilen el proyecto, el cual yo creo, es la mejor oportunidad que ha tenido el pa&amp;amp;iacute;s de aprobar una reforma migratoria y que francamente ayudar&amp;amp;aacute; a sacarnos del estancamiento bipartidista en el que se encuentra el Senado, el Congreso, y el pa&amp;amp;iacute;s.</description>
			<link>http://www.dpcc.senate.gov/?p=news&amp;id=242</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 15:06:00 EST</pubDate>
			
		</item>
	
		<item>
			<title>Senadores Cruz Y Cornyn Buscan Descarrilar La Reforma Migratoria</title>
			<description>Washington, D.C. - Los Senadores Republicanos de Texas, Cruz y Cornyn, presentaron enmiendas al proyecto de ley para reformar nuestro sistema migratorio que podrIan descarrilarlo. La enmienda del Senador Cruz busca negar permanentemente la ciudadan&amp;amp;iacute;a para los todos los 11 millones de indocumentados que se encuentran dentro del pa&amp;amp;iacute;s. Por su parte, las enmiendas del Senador Cornyn buscan aumentar la militarizaci&amp;amp;oacute;n de la frontera y agrega requisitos de seguridad fronteriza imposibles de alcanzar como condici&amp;amp;oacute;n para la legalizaci&amp;amp;oacute;n de los indocumentados. Las enmiendas de ambos Senadores descarrilar&amp;amp;iacute;an la reforma migratoria ya que destruir&amp;amp;iacute;an los pilares en los que se basa esta reforma. 
 
Lo bueno, lo malo y lo feo de las enmiendas a la reforma migratoria (Univisi&amp;amp;oacute;n) LINK&amp;amp;nbsp; LINK&amp;amp;nbsp; 
 
Abruman m&amp;amp;aacute;s de 300 enmiendas proyecto de reforma migratoria en EUA (Notimex) LINK
 
Immigration Bill Faces First Major Test (TIME) 
 
Ted Cruz of Texas proposed blocking a path to citizenship for anyone who has ever been willfully in the U.S. without legal status - an amendment that would strip out the heart of the bill. LINK 
 
Ted Cruz Files Amendment To Deny Path To Citizenship As Senate Works On Bill (Fox News Latino)
 
Cruz&apos;s amendments seek to further tighten border security, streamline the legal immigration process, deny public benefits to those here illegally, reform the high-skilled worker visa program and prohibit a path to citizenship for the undocumented. LINK
 
Poison Pills And Deal Breakers: Senate Panel Considers 300 Amendments To Immigration Reform Bill (Talking Points Memo)
 
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX), who has called citizenship a deal breaker for conservatives, filed an amendment that would ban anyone who has ever been &apos;willfully present&apos; in the United States without legal status from ever becoming a citizen - basically, everyone the bill&apos;s legalization provisions are designed to help. Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX), a critic of immigration reform, has submitted a lengthy amendment requiring &apos;operational control&apos; of the border, a standard that Department of Homeland Security officials have criticized for being too inflexible. It also establishes a Border Commission of Southwestern officials to monitor security - the current draft only creates such a commission if the administration fails in its own attempts to implement the bill. LINK
 
Immigration-reform bill faces 1st major test (Arizona Republic)
 
Among the amendments offered to kill the bill is one by Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, that would strip the legislation of one of its key foundations: providing a pathway to earned citizenship for illegal immigrants who have been in the country since Dec. 31, 2011, or earlier. The amendment states that &apos;no person who has previously been willfully present in the United States while not in lawful status shall be eligible for United States citizenship.&apos; LINK
 
Cruz Files Amendments to Immigration Reform Measure (Texas Tribune)
 
U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz has jumped into the immigration reform fray by filing a slew of amendments that call for additional fencing on the border and that block a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants. The freshman senator also filed a measure that would prohibit local, state and federal governments from doling out entitlement benefits to the millions living in the country illegally. LINK
 
Cruz draws battle lines on immigration (Houston Chronicle)
 
The crux of Cruz&apos;s opposition to the Gang of Eight plan is its proposed pathway to citizenship for an estimated 11 million people currently living in the U.S. without proper legal documentation. Cruz also is seeking to bar undocumented immigrants from receiving any &apos;entitlement&apos; benefits from local, state or federal agencies. LINK
 
GOP sharpens knives for immigration (Politico)
 
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) would block undocumented immigrants from earning citizenship, a major cornerstone of the 844-page bill. Cruz, Lee, Sessions, Iowa Sen. Chuck Grassley and Texas Sen. John Cornyn filed amendments that challenge the main tenets of the bill, making it highly unlikely that any of them would back it without a major overhaul. For instance, Cruz&apos;s proposal to ensure no one who has been in the U.S. illegally will be eligible for the pathway to citizenship would clearly be a nonstarter for Democrats on the panel, as well as a few committee Republicans who see legalizing the 11 million undocumented immigrants as an integral part of reform. LINK 
 
Immigration reform&apos;s enemies, allies prepare battery of amendments (NBC)
 
Sen. John Cornyn of Texas submitted his own 70-page plan to step up border security and stiffen the &apos;triggers&apos; for the path to citizenship. Tea Party newcomer Ted Cruz -- also from Texas -- would triple the amount of federal agents currently stationed on the U.S.-Mexico border and quadruple the presence of drones and cameras. Cruz has proposed a measure that would flatly deny eligibility for citizenship to anyone who has been &apos;willfully present&apos; in the United States without legal status. Those rules would apply even to undocumented immigrants who have returned to their home country or to children brought to the United States illegally by their parents - those who would be eligible for the DREAM Act provisions. LINK 
 
The Immigration Amendments You Need to Know (ABC/Univision)
 
Undocumented Immigrants Should Never Be Citizens. Rather than waste his time making a path to citizenship more difficult for undocumented immigrants, Ted Cruz (R-Texas) took a more direct approach: ban it. An amendment submitted by Cruz would ban undocumented immigrants from ever becoming citizens. That&apos;s significantly harsher than current law, which doesn&apos;t provide a reasonable pathway to citizenship for most undocumented immigrants, but doesn&apos;t specifically ban it, either. LINK 
 
With 300 amendments, advocates brace for tough start of Senate immigration hearings (NBC Latino)
 
Texas Republican Senator Ted Cruz submitted an amendment to bar any undocumented immigrant from an eventual pathway to citizenship. Immigration reform advocates from the Alliance for Citizenship also expressed concern over other amendments, including one calling for mandatory DNA samples for those pursuing a path to citizenship, proposed by Utah Republican Orrin Hatch, or one calling for more&amp;amp;nbsp; border security triggers before a pathway to citizenship is allowed, proposed by Texas Republican Senator Jon Cornyn. LINK 
 
Immigration reform: Four poison-pill amendments being considered (Denver Post)
 
An amendment from Republican Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas would bar most undocumented immigrants from being eligible for U.S. citizenship ever. Why it&apos;s a poison pill: A pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants is at the heart of the bipartisan proposal. LINK 
 
Altering Immigration Bill Risks Losing Senators&apos; Votes (Bloomberg)
 
Senator Ted Cruz, a Texas Republican, is proposing a full replacement of the border-security provisions. Cruz would triple the number of Border Patrol agents along the U.S.-Mexico border and quadruple surveillance equipment such as cameras and drones before any prospective citizen could be granted &apos;registered provisional immigrant&apos; status. LINK
 
10 Immigration Amendments to Watch (Roll Call)
 
Senate Republican Whip John Cornyn of Texas filed an amendment to set up a process for giving federal reimbursement to state and local governments for the costs associated with immigration enforcement and detention. The Lone Star State would undoubtedly receive a large share of that money because of its roughly 2,000-mile border with Mexico. LINK</description>
			<link>http://www.dpcc.senate.gov/?p=news&amp;id=241</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 13:18:00 EST</pubDate>
			
		</item>
	
		<item>
			<title>38 Straight Months Of Private Sector Job Growth</title>
			<description>Under President Obama&apos;s leadership, the economy has added private sector jobs for 38 straight months. During this span, 6.8 million private sector jobs have been created.
In the Senate, Democrats are fighting to continue this positive trend and help speed along the economic recovery.
Click&amp;amp;nbsp;here&amp;amp;nbsp;to see examples of jobs-boosting measures enacted so far by the Senate:
&amp;amp;nbsp;
&amp;amp;nbsp;</description>
			<link>http://www.dpcc.senate.gov/?p=blog&amp;id=172</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 09:30:00 EST</pubDate>
			<enclosure url="http://www.dpcc.senate.gov/files/images/DPCCPrivateSectorPayrollApril2013.png" type="image/jpeg" />
		</item>
	
		<item>
			<title>Summary of the Managers Amendment to S. 744</title>
			<description>1.&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 3. Effective Date Triggers - Technical amendments clarifying the citations for the Employment Verification System in the bill and clarifying the name of Agricultural Worker visa in the bill. 
2.&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 4. Southern Border Security Commission - Two grammatical corrections to the text.
3.&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 5. Comprehensive Southern Border Security Strategy and Southern Border Fencing Strategy - Two grammatical corrections to the text.
4.&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 6. Comprehensive Immigration Reform Trust Fund - Reorganization of the section to ensure that every fee that is collected within the legislation to pay for the cost of the legislation is included in the Trust Fund.&amp;amp;nbsp; Technical corrections to the appropriations language to ensure that funds are properly collected and distributed to meet the goals of the legislation.&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp; Increase in the upfront appropriation to the Department of Homeland Security and State Department to implement the legislation.&amp;amp;nbsp; Amendment to ensure that the appropriation is immediately paid back to the Treasury upon the collection of the fees enumerated in the bill. 
Title I - Border Security
5.&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 1101. Definitions - Added a definition of the Northern Border.
6.&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 1102. Additional U.S. Customs and Border Protection Officers- Two grammatical corrections to the text. Technical amendments clarifying the appropriations language and clarifying that the intent of this Section is to increase the fee for Visa Waiver visitors by $16 in order to fund the costs of 3,500 new Customs and Border Protection Officers.&amp;amp;nbsp; The Travel Promotion fee is permanently reauthorized for use in travel promotion activities. 
7.&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 1104. Enhancement of Existing Border Security Operations-Clarified appropriations language and making five grammatical corrections to the text. Technical amendments clarifying the appropriations language. 
8.&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 1105. Border Security on Certain Federal Lands-Grammatical change.
9.&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 1106. Equipment and Technology-Fixed subsection (a)(1) to make it consistent with subsection (a)(2) and (a)(3) and clarify that all unmanned systems are unarmed.
10.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 1108. Southwest Border Region Prosecution Initiative-Clarified the intent of the language to match the intent of the drafters that reimbursement is for immigration-related criminal cases.
11.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 1112. Training for Border Security and Immigration Enforcement Officers- Made two clarifying edits properly naming the governmental entities involved. 
12.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 1113. Department of Homeland Security Border Oversight Task Force-Technical amendment clarifying appointments to the task force and requiring that DHS provide an explanation to the public if it disagrees with any findings of the DHS task force.
13.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 1116. Severability and Delegation-Clarifying that the Secretary of Homeland Security has the authority to work with and empower other federal agencies to implement the provisions of this legislation.
14.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 2101. Registered Provisional Immigrant Status-Making 11 technical corrections improving the grammar of the section and fixing the appropriations language or legal cross-references in the section.
15.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 2102. Adjustment of Status of Registered Provisional Immigrants-Making 11 technical corrections improving the grammar of the section and fixing the appropriations language or legal cross-references in the section.&amp;amp;nbsp; Clarifying that homeschooling can count toward the educational requirements.&amp;amp;nbsp; Clarifying the date of selective service enrollment. 
16.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 2103. The Dream Act-Clarifying that homeschooling can count toward the educational requirements. Made 8 technical corrections improving the grammar and legal citations of the section.
17.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 2104. Additional Requirements- Making 9 technical corrections improving the grammar and legal citations of the section.&amp;amp;nbsp; Clarifying that information from an immigration application under this section shall be provided by the Secretary of Homeland Security to other law enforcement in connection with a criminal felony investigation even if that information is not requested.
18.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 2106. Grant Program to Assist Eligible Applicants-Three stylistic technical edits.
19.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 2107. Conforming Amendments to the Social Security Act-Clarifies that a state may terminate parental rights of a removed parent to a U.S. citizen child if the parent is unfit or unwilling to be a parent of the child.&amp;amp;nbsp; Requires States to notify parents in immigration detention of an intent to terminate parental rights.&amp;amp;nbsp; Several grammatical fixes.
20.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 2108. Government Contracting and Acquisition of Real Property Interest-Three grammatical fixes.
21.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 2202. Definitions-Amends the definition of agricultural employment to match the Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Worker Protection Act. 
22.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 2211. Requirements for Blue Card Status-Clarifies that an application for blue card status may be submitted through certain third parties.&amp;amp;nbsp; Clarifies that qualified nonimmigrants who have participated in the H-2A Program may apply for blue card status from outside of the United States. Clarifies appropriations language, grammatical corrections to the text, and technical amendments clarifying the cross-referenced legal citations in the text.&amp;amp;nbsp; Clarifies proper use of employment records for agricultural employers.
23.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 2212. Adjustment to Permanent Resident Status-Amends the legal citations for this section.&amp;amp;nbsp; Clarifies definitions in the section to match previous sections.&amp;amp;nbsp; Amends the appropriations language to conform with other sections of the bill. Amends the administrative and judicial review available to agricultural workers to match other sections of the text.&amp;amp;nbsp; Adds the definition of federal tax liability from other sections of the bill. 
24.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 2213. Use of Information-Amends the legal citation.
25.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 2214. Reports on Blue Cards-Amends the legal citations.
26.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 2231. Nonimmigrant Classification for Nonimmigrant Agricultural Workers-Amends the legal citations. Deletes requirement that the Secretary of Agricultural provide notice than an employer has accepted the terms and conditions of employment of a W-agricultural worker. 
27.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 2232. Establishment of Nonimmigrant Agricultural Worker Program- Amends the definition of agricultural employment to match the Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Worker Protection Act. Amends the legal citations in the section. Adds a requirement of consultation with the Secretary of Labor regarding an adjustment of the agricultural worker cap.&amp;amp;nbsp; Clarifies that renewal of 3-year terms for agricultural workers is available. Clarifies the time the Secretary of Agriculture has to make a decision on petitions to increase worker numbers.&amp;amp;nbsp; Clarifies appropriations language and makes several grammatical and stylistic changes.&amp;amp;nbsp; Clarifies the review process (expedites the review process) by the Secretary of Homeland Security for petitions for foreign agricultural workers.
28.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 2233. Transition of H-2A Worker Program- Makes several grammatical and stylistic changes and amends legal citations in the language.&amp;amp;nbsp; Clarifies that a current H-2A worker can stay for the shorter of 10 months or the time specified in the position.
29.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 2301. Merit-Based Points Track One- Makes several grammatical and stylistic changes and amends legal citations in the language. Clarifies that foreign equivalents of U.S. degrees count for points system. Clarifies that Job Zone 3 immigrants can earn points in Tier 2.&amp;amp;nbsp; Amends the English proficiency points in Tier 2 to a standardized examination deemed appropriate by the Department of Education. &amp;amp;nbsp;Clarifies appropriations language and assesses an additional $1,500 fee on merit-based green cards. Clarifies that Registered Provisional Immigrants are not eligible to receive a merit-based immigrant visa under section 201(e).
30.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 2302. Merit-Based Points Track Two-Makes several grammatical and stylistic changes and amends legal citations in the language.&amp;amp;nbsp; Clarifies that an alien had to be authorized for employment in order to be classified as a long-term alien worker.
31.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 2303. Repeal of the Diversity Visa Program- Makes several grammatical and stylistic changes and amends legal citations in the language.&amp;amp;nbsp; 
32.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 2304. Worldwide Levels and Recapture of Unused Immigrant Visas- Makes several grammatical and stylistic changes and amends legal citations in the language.&amp;amp;nbsp; 
33.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 2305 Reclassification of Spouses and Minor Children of Lawful Permanent Residents as Immediate Relatives-At the advice of legislative counsel, reprints the entire section of current law in order to more easily and accurately accomplish the goal of reclassifying spouses and minor children of lawful permanent residents as immediate relatives.&amp;amp;nbsp; 
34.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 2307. Allocation of Immigrant Visas - Makes several grammatical and stylistic changes and amends legal citations in the language.&amp;amp;nbsp; Clarifies that foreign equivalents of U.S. degrees count for green card purposes for doctorate degrees.&amp;amp;nbsp; Clarifies that aliens who have STEM advanced degrees are exempt from green card caps.&amp;amp;nbsp; Strikes duplicative language.
35.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 2308. V Nonimmigrant Visas-Clarifies age restriction language and harmonizes tax definitions with the rest of the bill.
36.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 2309. Fianc&amp;amp;eacute; and Fianc&amp;amp;eacute; Child Status Protection-Makes several grammatical and stylistic changes and amends legal citations in the language.
37.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 2311. Modification of Adoption Age Requirements-Clarifies the age requirement in the legislation. 
38.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 2312. Relief for Orphans, Widows, and Widowers-Makes several grammatical and stylistic changes and amends legal citations in the language.
39.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 2313. Discretionary Authority with Respect to Removal, Deportation, or Inadmissibility of Citizen and Resident Immediate Family Members- Makes several grammatical and stylistic changes and amends legal citations in the language.
40.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 2314. Waivers of Inadmissibility-Adds the word child in one section where it was unintentionally excluded in the bill. 
41.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 2316. Global Health Care Cooperation- Makes a stylistic change.
42.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 2317. Extension and Improvement of the Iraqi Special Immigrant Visa Program- Makes a stylistic change and a technical amendment to fix a legal citation.
43.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 2402. Retaining Physicians Who Have Practiced in Medically Underserved Communities-Fixed legal citations. 
44.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 2403. Employment Protection for Physicians-Clarifies that alien physicians must use their J-1 waiver expeditiously after obtaining the waiver. 
45.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 2405. Amendments to the Procedures, Definitions, and Other Provisions Related to Physician Immigration-Deletes clarifications to the National Interest Waiver.
46.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 2511. Office of Citizenship and New Americans-Provides consultation requirements with the Task Force on New Americans and makes stylistic changes and technical amendments to fix legal citations.
47.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 2522. Purpose-Technical Change from Secretary to Federal Government.
48.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 2523. Membership-Adds the National Security Advisor to the task force.
49.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 2531. Establishment of United States Citizenship Foundation-Clarifies non-profit language.
50.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 2533. Purposes and Section 2534. Authorized Activies-Edit to add &apos;lawful&apos; before permanent resident.
51.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 2535 Council of Directors-Harmonized language with Section 501(c)(3).
52.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 2537. Initial Entry, Adjustment, and Citizenship Assistance Grant Program-Clarified that this applies to agricultural workers.
53.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 2551. Waiver of English Requirement for Senior New Americans-Clarified the disability exception to harmonize with current disability law. 
54.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 3101. Unlawful Employment of Unauthorized Aliens.-Makes several grammatical and stylistic changes and amends legal citations in the language. Deletes the good faith defense of failing to obtain a response from the system.&amp;amp;nbsp; Amends the language pertaining to remedies for labor law violations to ensure that remedies are available for employer&apos;s violations of labor law.&amp;amp;nbsp; Provides for videoconference verification of remote workers.&amp;amp;nbsp; Provides for identification to be used from U.S. territories.&amp;amp;nbsp; Clarifies that an employee who withdraws their appeal no longer has to be employed by an employer.&amp;amp;nbsp; Requires the Secretary to protect the confidentiality of information that could be used to endanger the worker.&amp;amp;nbsp; Clarifies that E-verify remains in effect during the entire period of this legislation and never lapses. 
55.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 3102. Increasing Security and Integrity of Social Security Cards.-Amends the appropriations language. Make stylistic and grammatical clarifications. 
56.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 3105. Improved Prohibition on Discrimination Based on National Origin or Citizenship Status- Makes stylistic and grammatical clarifications. Edits a typographical error on number of employees. 
57.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 3106. Rulemaking - Fixes legal citations.
58.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 3201. Protection for Victims of Serious Violations of Labor and Employment Law or Crime-Fixes legal citations. Makes stylistic and grammatical clarifications.
59.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 3202. Employment Verification System Education Funding-Adds the Attorney General to education fund. 
60.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 3204. Confidentiality for Victims of Crime.-Deletes the Section.
61.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 3301.Funding- Clarifies and amends the appropriations language.
62.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 3304. Identity-theft resistant manifest information for passengers, crew, and non-crew onboard departing aircraft and vessels-Fixes legal citations. Makes stylistic and grammatical clarifications.
63.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 3305. Profiling- Fixes legal citations. Makes stylistic and grammatical clarifications.
64.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 3401.Time limits and efficient adjudication of genuine asylum claims- Fixes legal citations. Makes stylistic and grammatical clarifications.
65.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 3402.Refugee family protections- Fixes legal citations. Makes stylistic and grammatical clarifications.
66.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 3403.Clarification on designation of certain refugees- Fixes legal citations. Makes stylistic and grammatical clarifications.
67.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 3404.Asylum determination efficiency- Fixes legal citations. Makes stylistic and grammatical clarifications.
68.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 3405. Stateless persons in the United States- Fixes legal citations. Makes stylistic and grammatical clarifications.
69.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 3503. Office of Legal Access Programs- Makes stylistic and grammatical clarifications and adds DOJ consultation. 
70.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 3504.Codifying Board of Immigration Appeals- Fixes legal citations. Makes stylistic and grammatical clarifications.
71.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 3601. Definitions-Amended the definition of foreign labor contracting activity to limit it to recruiting, soliciting and related activities.&amp;amp;nbsp; Remove the Secretary of Labor from the enforcement of this program. 
72.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 3602. Disclosure-Amend the disclosure requirements to those limited to the knowledge of the recruiter.
73.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 3605. Registration-Removes requirements for registration when an employer is self-recruiting.&amp;amp;nbsp; Fixes legal citations. Makes stylistic and grammatical clarifications.
74.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 3608. Amendment to the Immigration and Nationality Act-Adds the W-visa to the list of visas covered by the recruiting language.
75.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 3609. Responsibilities of Secretary of State- Fixes legal citations. Makes stylistic and grammatical clarifications.
&amp;amp;nbsp;76.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 3610.Enforcement provisions- Fixes legal citations. Makes stylistic and grammatical clarifications. Provides a safe harbor for employers who use a registered recruiter and do not act with reckless disregard of recruiter&apos;s illegal acts.
77.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 3701. Criminal Street Gangs-Fixes legal citations. Makes stylistic and grammatical clarifications.
78.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 3702.Banning habitual drunk drivers from the United States-Fixes legal citations. Makes stylistic and grammatical clarifications.&amp;amp;nbsp; Clarifies that convictions had to occur on different dates and at least 1 conviction had to occur after passage of the bill.
79.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 3717.Procedures for bond hearings and filing of notices to appear- Fixes legal citations. Makes stylistic and grammatical clarifications.
80.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 3719. Gross Violations of Human Rights-Adds a duress exception. Fixes legal citations. Makes stylistic and grammatical clarifications.
81.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 4101. Market Based H-1B Visa Limits- Makes stylistic and grammatical clarifications. Adds biological and biomedical sciences to list of included STEM fields.
82.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 4104. &amp;amp;nbsp;STEM Education and Training- Fixes legal citations. Makes stylistic and grammatical clarifications.&amp;amp;nbsp; Amends text to provide more access to STEM fund to women and minorities and to allow for loan-repayment for students and issuance of bonds by schools.&amp;amp;nbsp; 
83.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 4105. H-1B and L Visa Fees-Adds new fees on H-1B and L-1 employers to assist in funding the cost of this legislation. 
84.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 4211. Modification of application requirements-Fixes legal citations. Makes stylistic and grammatical clarifications.&amp;amp;nbsp; Clarifies prevailing wage requirements for nonprofit educational institutions and research organizations. 
85.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 4224. Information Sharing-Fixes legal citations. Makes stylistic and grammatical clarifications.&amp;amp;nbsp; 
86.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 4232. Requirements for information for H-1B and L nonimmigrants- Fixes legal citations. Makes stylistic and grammatical clarifications.&amp;amp;nbsp; 
87.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 4233. Filing Fee for H-1B Dependent Employers-Clarifies that fees do not sunset. Fixes legal citations. Makes stylistic and grammatical clarifications. Fixes the appropriations&apos; language.
88.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 4301. Prohibition on Outplacement of L-Nonimmigrants-Clarifies the definition of outplacement not to include outplacement within a related corporate entity.
89.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 4305. Filing Fee for L Nonimmigrants-Clarifies that fees do not sunset. Fixes legal citations. Makes stylistic and grammatical clarifications. Fixes the appropriations&apos; language.
90.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 4401.Nonimmigrant visas for students-Fixes legal citations
&amp;amp;nbsp; 91.&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;Section 4402.Classification for specialty occupation workers from free trade countries- Fixes legal citations
92.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 4404. Other changes to nonimmigrant visas-Provides procedural due process protections to aliens seeking entry for a motion picture or television production. 
93.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 4407. J-1 Visa Exchange Visitor Program Fee-Adds new fees on J-1 employers parallel to fees for similar visas. 
94.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 4408. F-1 Visa Fee- Adds new fees on F-1 aliens parallel to fees for similar visas. 
95.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 4503. Encouraging Canadian Tourism to the United States-Clarifies that extensions are permitted and that spouses of principal applicants do not need to be above the age of 55. 
96.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 4504. Retiree Visa- Adds a $1,000 fee parallel to fees for similar visas. 
97.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 4509. B-Visa Fee-- Adds new $5 fees on B-visas parallel to fees for similar visas. 
98.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 4601. Extension of returning worker exemption to H-2B numerical limitation-Amends definition of certain H-2B professions using the H-2B program and the P-Visa program and providing the correct legal citation for the H-2B returning worker exemption.
99.&amp;amp;nbsp; Section 4701. Bureau of Immigration and Labor Market Research-Stylistic and grammatical edits and fixes to legal citations.&amp;amp;nbsp; Clarifies the fee language. 
100. Section 4702. Nonimmigrant Classification for W-nonimmigrants-clarifies that W-1 status is for non-agricultural employees.
101. Section 4703. Admission of W Nonimmigrant Workers- Stylistic and Grammatical edits and fixes to legal citations.&amp;amp;nbsp; Requires employers to attest that they will substantially comply with all applicable labor and employment laws related to the W nonimmigrant&apos;s employment.&amp;amp;nbsp; Clarifies that only animal production employers may exceed the cap and that all employers may promote workers to another position without losing a registered slot. 
102. Section 4801. Nonimmigrant Invest Visas- Stylistic and grammatical edits and fixes to legal citations.&amp;amp;nbsp; Adding a $1,000 fee for investor visas parallel to fees for similar visas. 
103. Section 4802 Invest Immigrant Visa- Stylistic and grammatical edits and fixes to legal citations.
104. Section 4803. Administration and Oversight- Stylistic and grammatical edits and fixes to legal citations. Adding a report on the success of the program.</description>
			<link>http://www.dpcc.senate.gov/?p=news&amp;id=237</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 12:01:00 EST</pubDate>
			
		</item>
	
		<item>
			<title>Beginning a National Conversation on Common-Sense Immigration Reform</title>
			<description>Resources:
 



Summary of Border Security, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Act Of 2013&amp;amp;nbsp; [en Espa&amp;amp;ntilde;ol]
Summary of Managers&apos; Amendment to S. 744, the Border Security, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Act Of 2013
Blog: What They&apos;re Saying About the Senate&apos;s Bipartisan Immigration Proposal
By The Numbers: Border Security, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Act of 2013
Timeline: Immigration in 2013
Senate Judiciary Committee List of Amendments to S. 744
 
 
Text of Manager&apos;s Amendment: 
Managers&apos; Amendment to S. 744

&amp;amp;nbsp;
Bill Text: 
 
Border Security, Economic Opportunity, And Immigration Modernization Act of 2013</description>
			<link>http://www.dpcc.senate.gov/?p=press_release&amp;id=233</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 02:30:00 EST</pubDate>
			
		</item>
	
		<item>
			<title>Summary of Border Security, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Act Of 2013</title>
			<description>Title I.&amp;amp;nbsp; Border Security
 
This Title provides for border security measures that will achieve and maintain effective control in high risk areas of the Southern border. 
 

Border Plan: Stage one requires the DHS      Secretary to develop a Comprehensive Border Security Strategy and Southern      Border Fencing Strategy within six months before the registration period      for Registered Provisional Immigrant status (RPI) begins.&amp;amp;nbsp; These      strategies must be designed to achieve persistent surveillance of the      border and a 90% effectiveness rate for apprehensions and returns in high      risk border sectors. The bill appropriates $3 billion for this plan which      will include technology, personnel and other resources. 

Triggers: The Secretary&apos;s border plan      must be operational before any RPIs may apply for adjustment of status.      The Secretary must develop and implement a fencing plan ($1.5 billion);      E-Verify must be mandatory and operational; and a biographic entry-exit      system at air and seaports must be implemented before RPIs may adjust to      permanent residence.&amp;amp;nbsp; 

Southwest Governors Commission: After five years, if the      specified goals of 90% effectiveness and persistent surveillance have not      been met, a Southern Border Security Commission will be established to      make further recommendations for achieving these goals.&amp;amp;nbsp; The      Commission would recommend up to $2 billion in additional DHS spending      that would be available to achieve the border security goals if they have      not yet been met.

Additional Resources: To further ensure completion      of these targets, Customs and Border Patrol personnel and resources will      be increased, additional funding for border prosecutions in the Tucson      sector are funded, and the authority of the National Guard to assist in      border security operations is codified.

DHS Oversight: To protect the integrity of      the system, additional resources and training will be devoted to      implementing a DHS-wide use of force policy and associated training in      appropriate use of force and the impact of federal operations on border      communities.&amp;amp;nbsp; A Border Oversight Taskforce is established to take      testimony and conduct hearings in order to review and recommend changes to      existing border policies.&amp;amp;nbsp; The current duties of the USCIS      Ombudsman&apos;s office will be expanded to encompass all DHS immigration      functions. DHS will be required to issue regulations on racial profiling      that are based on a study analyzing individualized data on DHS officers      enforcement activity.

 
Title II.&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp; Legalization (Registered Provisional Immigrant program) and Legal Immigration
 
This title provides a path to citizenship for the 11.5 undocumented immigrants in the United States. It establishes a new framework for future legal immigration by revamping the current family and employment based systems and creating two additional merit-based immigration systems. 
 
SubPart A.&amp;amp;nbsp; Creation of Registered Provisional Immigrant program
 

Registration Requirements: Immigrants who entered the      United States before December 31, 2011 and have been physically present in      the U.S. since that time will be eligible to apply for Registered      Provisional Immigrant (RPI) status provided they pass a background check,      have not been convicted of a serious crime, pay any assessed tax      liability, and pay appropriate fees and a $500 fine. 

Initial registration will be valid for six years.      It provides for work and travel authorization, and includes spouses and      children in the United States on the same application.&amp;amp;nbsp; 

Renewal: RPIs applying for renewal      will be subject to a new background check, payment of processing fees,      payment of taxes, and a $500 fine. RPIs must provide evidence of having      been 1) regularly employed while meeting a requirement that he/she is not      likely to become a public charge or 2) having resources to demonstrate      100% of the poverty level.

Adjustment of Status to      Permanent Residency:      At the end of ten years, RPIs may apply for adjustment of status, provided      that they demonstrate: 1) they are admissible, 2) pay an additional $1000      fine per adult plus application fees; 3) prove they are learning English;      4) pay their taxes; 5) pass a background check and 6) demonstrate      compliance with the employment requirement. Specifically, they must show:      1) they have regularly worked in the U.S. such that they are not likely to      become a public charge or 2) they have resources to meet 125% of the      Federal Poverty Level. Under the revamped legal immigration system,      individuals present in the U.S. for 10 years in lawful status can adjust      status to lawful permanent residence including RPIs and other legal      immigrants. RPIs may apply for naturalization after an additional three      year wait, making the total path to citizenship about 13 years. The bill      includes a &apos;back of the line&apos; requirement: RPIs may not adjust status      until the family and employment backlogs are cleared.&amp;amp;nbsp; 

Timeline: DHS has 12 months to issue      regulations. Then there is a one year initial application period which can      be extended by the Secretary for up to 18 months. 

DREAM Act: Individuals who entered the      U.S. before the age of 16 and who have completed high school or obtained a      GED in the U.S. may register for RPI status through the DREAM Act.&amp;amp;nbsp;      There is no age cap for the program. Individuals who received Deferred      Action for Childhood Arrivals are grandfathered into RPI status.&amp;amp;nbsp;      DREAM RPIs are exempted from penalties and the triggers.&amp;amp;nbsp; Five years      after registration, DREAM RPIs may apply for adjustment of status; their      time in RPI status will count towards eligibility for naturalization,      allowing them to become citizens immediately after receiving their green      card. Children under age 16 have a five year path to citizenship and are      exempted from certain requirements. The bill heightens child welfare      protections to ensure parental rights are not terminated on the basis of a      parent&apos;s immigration status alone.

Agricultural program: Undocumented farm workers who      can demonstrate a minimum of 100 work days or 575 hours in the two years      prior to the date of enactment would be eligible for an Agricultural Card.      Workers who work at least 100 days a year for five years or workers who      perform at least 150 days a year for three years can adjust status to      permanent residency. To be eligible for permanent residence, agricultural      workers must show that they have paid all taxes, have not been convicted      of any serious crime, and pay a $400 fine.

Integration: Creates an Office of New      Americans, a New Americans taskforce and additional initiatives to help immigrants      learn English, American civics and integrate into local communities.      Provides funding for programs to help non-profits and local government      with these initiatives. 

 
SubPart B.&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp; Legal Immigration Reforms
 

New Merit-Based System: Creates a &apos;Track One&apos; merit      based visa which will initially allocate 120,000 visas annually based on a      points system, with the possibility of increasing the allotment by 5% (up      to 250,000) in any year when unemployment is under 8.5%.&amp;amp;nbsp; Points will      be awarded for factors such as education, employment, family in the U.S.      and length of residence in the U.S. Half of the merit visas will be set      aside for high skilled individuals and half of the cap will be for lower      skilled workers.

A new &apos;Track Two&apos; merit-based      system is created to clear the employment and family backlogs. In addition, this      system allows individuals who are lawfully present in the U.S. for over      ten years with work authorization to adjust status to permanent residence. 

Lawful Permanent Residents&apos;      spouses and children: The      current family based categories will be revised to permit the spouses and      children of lawful permanent residents to immigrate immediately.

Additional changes to the      current family system: The current sibling category will be eliminated 18 months after enactment.      The 3rd preference family category (adult married children of      U.S. citizens) will have an age cap of 31 beginning 18 months after      enactment. The backlog reduction program will include processing of      petitions in phased-out family categories. U.S. citizens can petition for      a sibling for up to 18 months after enactment.&amp;amp;nbsp; 

New Family &apos;V&apos; Visa: Creates a new nonimmigrant      visa for families with approved petitions to work and live in the U.S.      while waiting for their green card. Allows other family members including      siblings to visit the U.S. for up to 60 days per year.

Employment-Based Reforms: Spouses and children of      employment based visa applicants, STEM graduates with doctoral degrees,      certain other professionals, and certain foreign doctors are exempt from      the employment visa cap. The cap on low-skilled workers is raised.

Additional Backlog Reduction      and Improvements: Additional provisions to streamline processing and reduce backlogs include      elimination of employment based country caps, an increase in family based      country limits, and recapture of unused visa numbers. Popular programs for      foreign doctors (Conrad-30), religious worker recruitment, and EB-5      investors are permanently reauthorized. Numerous other technical fixes to      improve and streamline current visa programs are included (additional      protections for stepchildren, widows, and other family members.)

Judicial Discretion: Expands the authority of      immigration judges and DHS to waive removal on humanitarian grounds.&amp;amp;nbsp; 

 
Title Three. Interior Enforcement.
 
This title mandates E-Verify, provides additional worker protections, reforms the immigration court system and provides additional measures related to interior enforcement.
 

Five year phase-in of mandatory      E-Verify: An      electronic employment verification system (E-verify) will cover all      employers within a five year period, beginning with federal contractors      and critical infrastructure employers. It requires identity verification      through use of enhanced fraud-proof documents. Specifically prohibits      creation of a national ID card.

Anti-fraud measures: Expands ability to protect      against identity theft of Social Security numbers by allowing employees to      block their social security number and gives employees access to personal      E-verify history.&amp;amp;nbsp; It provides for an expansion of the photo      identification mechanism as a component of E-verify and encourages states      to provide photos to DHS.

Due Process: Expands due process protections      for employees to ensure that legal workers are not prevented from working      due to errors in the system or because of employer negligence or      misconduct. Provides for back-pay if an employee loses work unfairly due      to system or employer error. Provides a stay of termination of employment      to give the worker time to correct any errors in the system. 

Worker Protections: Includes protections for      employers and employees, including pre-emption of state verification laws,      expansion of U visas in employer abuse situations, and program funding.      The bill also cracks down on labor recruitment abuse.

Refugee/Asylum Issues: Streamlines processing in      refugee and asylum cases by eliminating one year asylum filing deadline,      eliminating family reunification barriers for asylees and refugees,      authorizing streamlined processing of certain high risk refugee groups,      authorizing asylum officers to grant asylum for eligible applicants during      credible fear interviews, and permits qualified stateless individuals to      apply for lawful permanent resident status.

Immigration Court Improvements: Authorizes increase in      immigration court personnel, additional resources, and more training for      judges and other staff; access to counsel for vulnerable populations to      improve efficiency of courts, and permanently codifies Board of      Immigration Appeals and legal orientation programs.

Interior Enforcement: Tightens certain grounds of      inadmissibility relating to document and passport fraud, driving while      intoxicated following three convictions, conviction for gang related      activities, convictions related to domestic violence, child abuse,      stalking, violation of protection orders and failing to register as a sex      offender.&amp;amp;nbsp; Prohibits and or increases penalties for abusive      smuggling, illegal entry, and re-entry. Creates a mandatory exit      verification system.

Detention Reform: Increases oversight of      detention facilities, expands the ability of immigration judges to conduct      bond hearings, and expands alternatives to detention.

 
Title IV. Reforms to Non Immigrant Visa Programs.
 
This Title reforms current non-immigrant visa programs and creates a new worker visa that melds greater employer flexibility with worker protections and ability to apply for permanent residence.&amp;amp;nbsp; 
 

H-1B: Changes to the H-1B high      skilled visa program include expanding the current cap from 65,000 to      110,000 with an option to ultimately increase the cap to 180,000 visas      annually based on a High Skilled Jobs Demand Index. Allows for work authorization      for spouses and children.&amp;amp;nbsp; Increases requirements for recruiting and      offering jobs to U.S. workers at higher wages prior to hiring foreign      workers. Increases fines and wage requirements for companies that are      heavy-users of H-1B visas. After 3 years, companies whose workforce is      more than fifty percent H-1Bs are barred. 

Deterring Abuse: Establishes significant new      authorities and penalties to prevent, detect, and deter fraud and abuse of      the H-1B and L-1 visa systems by fraudulent employers.&amp;amp;nbsp; Increases      wages for foreign workers to help protect Americans.

H-2B: Makes permanent the H-2B      returning worker provision.&amp;amp;nbsp; 

New Worker Program (W Visa): Establishes a new      nonimmigrant W classification for lesser-skilled foreign workers      performing services or labor for a registered employer in a registered      position. Spouses and minor children are included and are work-authorized.      It is a three year visa with three year renewal periods. Initially, 20,000      W visas will be made available, rising to 75,000 visas in four years. The      visa program cap can rise to 200,000 depending on a formula based on      unemployment, job openings, number of applications and the recommendations      of a newly established Bureau of Immigration and Labor Market Research.      Shortage occupation employers can hire workers outside the cap. W visa      holders may switch from one registered employer to another without penalty      and apply for the merits-based lawful permanent residence program or the      Employment-Based system. 

Agriculture: A new agricultural guest worker visa program would be      established to provide a more stable agricultural workforce. A portable,      at-will employment based visa (W-3 visa) and a contract-based visa (W-2      visa) administered by the Department of Agriculture would replace the      current H-2A program. It will provide growers with a streamlined process      to petition for worker while ensuring critical worker protections. The      H-2A program would sunset after the new guest worker visa program is      operational. 

INVEST Visa: This bill creates      a new INVEST visa for foreign entrepreneurs who seek to come to the U.S.      to start their own companies. This 3-year visa would be available to      immigrant entrepreneurs who have a qualifying investor in the US and can      be renewed if it can demonstrate certain benchmarks related to the number      of jobs it creates and revenue it produces.</description>
			<link>http://www.dpcc.senate.gov/?p=news&amp;id=235</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 14:07:00 EST</pubDate>
			
		</item>
	
		<item>
			<title>What They&#146;re Saying About the Senate&#146;s Bipartisan Immigration Proposal</title>
			<description>Click here to read the Senate&apos;s bipartisan proposal to fix our nation&apos;s broken immigration system. 
Washington Post:&amp;amp;nbsp;An Immigration Bill Worthy of Support
&apos;The legislation is a milestone of pragmatism that, through tough trade-offs, would bring common sense to a broken immigration system that has come to symbolize dysfunction in Washington.&apos; 
 
&apos;The bill&apos;s authors seemed determined to fix so many problems and satisfy so many constituencies that it would be propelled from the outset by groups representing business, labor, agriculture, high tech, Hispanics and immigrants.&apos;
 
&apos;...immigration advocates&amp;amp;nbsp;have plenty to cheer in the legislation, including steps to extend hundreds of thousands of visas annually to low-skilled and agricultural workers; to nearly double the number of visas offered to foreign engineers and scientists, whose services are prized by high-tech firms; and to clear the backlog of several million relatives of U.S. citizens who have been waiting years to immigrate.&apos;&amp;amp;nbsp;
USA Today: &apos;Gang of Eight&apos; Plan Strikes a Balance
&apos;...Enforcement is the linchpin to the latest effort, announced Tuesday by a bipartisan group of eight senators.&apos; 
 
&apos;...Enforcement is the key. Politically, it is needed to get a law passed. Practically, it is needed to ensure that today&apos;s 11 million aren&apos;t followed by another 11 million.&apos; 
 
&apos;This kind of multipronged assault on illegal immigration is necessary to prevent the tide from picking up again once the economy improves. The Gang of Eight plan will undoubtedly undergo changes as it wends through the legislative process. But it&apos;s a good starting point for addressing one of the nation&apos;s most vexing problems.&apos; 
New York Times: An Immigration Blueprint
&apos;...Our quick read of a fresh bill finds other encouraging things besides the opening of the pathway. It includes a good version of the Dream Act, to help young people who were brought here illegally as children speedily become citizens.&apos;
 
&apos;There will be much to chew on in coming weeks, but it is worth a moment to marvel at the bill&apos;s mere existence, and at the delicate balancing of competing interests that coaxed this broad set of compromises into being.&apos; 
WSJ: The Immigration Windfall
&apos;Faster economic growth would in turn drive down the budget deficit over the next 10 years by at least $2.5 trillion. Think of it this way: A more generous and more skill-based immigration system would lower the budget deficit three times more than President Obama&apos;s fiscal-cliff tax increase enacted in January.&apos;
 
&apos;But on balance U.S. businesses and the overall economy would benefit from a growing supply of younger immigrants who would have decades of more productive, creative work to contribute to American prosperity.&apos; 
New York Post: The More the Merrier
&apos;...The bill represents a fair effort to address the one thing everyone agrees on: The status quo is harmful and self-defeating for the nation.&apos;
 
&apos;That would be the real victory: an immigration system that controls its borders while recognizing that those who come to America to work are assets, not liabilities.&apos;</description>
			<link>http://www.dpcc.senate.gov/?p=blog&amp;id=234</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 11:53:00 EST</pubDate>
			
		</item>
	
		<item>
			<title>Resumen del Proyecto De Ley Para La Seguridad Fronteriza, Oportunidades Econ&oacute;micas Y Modernizaci&oacute;n Migratoria Del 2013</title>
			<description>T&amp;amp;iacute;tulo I. Seguridad Fronteriza
 
Este t&amp;amp;iacute;tulo establece medidas de seguridad fronteriza que obtendr&amp;amp;aacute;n y mantendr&amp;amp;aacute;n control en zonas de alto riesgo en la Frontera Sur. 
 
&amp;amp;middot;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp; Plan Fronterizo: La primera etapa requiere que la Secretaria del Departamento de Seguridad Interna (DHS por sus siglas en ingl&amp;amp;eacute;s) desarrolle una Estrategia Integral de Seguridad Fronteriza y una Estrategia para el Mejoramiento de La Maya Fronteriza de la Frontera Sur durante los primeros seis meses y antes del comienzo del periodo de registro para el estatus de Inmigrante Provisional Registrado (RPI por sus siglas en ingl&amp;amp;eacute;s). Estas estrategias deben ser dise&amp;amp;ntilde;adas para lograr un patrullaje persistente de la frontera y 90% de efectividad de aprensiones y deportaciones en zonas fronterizas de alto riesgo. El proyecto de ley apropiar&amp;amp;iacute;a 3 mil millones de d&amp;amp;oacute;lares para el desarrollo de este plan e incluir&amp;amp;aacute; dinero destinado para tecnolog&amp;amp;iacute;a, agentes, y otros recursos. 
 
&amp;amp;middot;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp; Condiciones: El plan fronterizo de la Secretaria debe estar completamente en funci&amp;amp;oacute;n&amp;amp;nbsp; antes que cualquier RPI pueda aplicar para recibir un ajuste de estatus. La Secretaria debe desarrollar e implementar una Estrategia para el Mejoramiento de La Maya Fronteriza de la Frontera Sur (1.5 mil millones de d&amp;amp;oacute;lares); E-Verify debe ser obligatorio y operacional; y un sistema de entrada-y-salida biogr&amp;amp;aacute;fico en aeropuertos y puertos mar&amp;amp;iacute;timos debe ser implementado antes que los RPI puedan ajustar su estatus a residente permanente. 
 
&amp;amp;middot;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp; Comisi&amp;amp;oacute;n de Gobernadores del Suroeste: Si las metas especificadas de un 90% de efectividad de aprensiones y de patrullaje persistente de la frontera no se cumplen en los primeros cinco a&amp;amp;ntilde;os, se establecer&amp;amp;aacute; una Comisi&amp;amp;oacute;n de Seguridad para la Frontera Sur la cual dar&amp;amp;aacute; recomendaciones para el logro de estas metas. La comisi&amp;amp;oacute;n podr&amp;amp;iacute;a recomendar hasta 2 mil millones de d&amp;amp;oacute;lares adicionales para llevar acabo las metas de seguridad si no se han cumplido. 
 
&amp;amp;middot;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp; Recursos Adicionales: Para asegurar el cumplimiento de estos objetivos, los recursos destinados a los agentes de Aduanas y la Patrulla Fronteriza ser&amp;amp;aacute;n incrementados, se proporcionaran fondos adicionales para procesos fronterizos en la zona de Tucson, y se codificara la autoridad de la Guardia Nacional para asistir en las operaciones de seguridad en la frontera. 
 
&amp;amp;middot;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp; Supervisi&amp;amp;oacute;n del DHS: Para proteger la integridad del sistema, recursos adicionales y entrenamiento ser&amp;amp;aacute;n destinados para la implementaci&amp;amp;oacute;n de un programa que entrene a los agentes de DHS en el uso de fuerza apropiado y el impacto que tienen las operaciones federales en las comunidades fronterizas. Se establecer&amp;amp;aacute; un Grupo de Supervisi&amp;amp;oacute;n Fronterizo que organizar&amp;amp;aacute; audiencias para&amp;amp;nbsp; revisar y proponer cambios a operaciones fronterizas. Las funciones actuales del Ombudsman de la Oficina del Servicio de Ciudadan&amp;amp;iacute;a e Inmigraci&amp;amp;oacute;n de Estado Unidos (USCIS por sus siglas en ingl&amp;amp;eacute;s) ser&amp;amp;aacute;n expandidas para abarcar todas las funciones de inmigraci&amp;amp;oacute;n del DHS. DHS deber&amp;amp;aacute; dictar reglamentos contra la discriminaci&amp;amp;oacute;n racial&amp;amp;nbsp; basados en an&amp;amp;aacute;lisis individuales de los arrestos hechos por agentes del DHS.
 
T&amp;amp;iacute;tulo II.&amp;amp;nbsp; Legalizaci&amp;amp;oacute;n (Programa de Inmigrante Provisional Registrado) e Inmigraci&amp;amp;oacute;n Legal
 
Este t&amp;amp;iacute;tulo provee un camino a la ciudadan&amp;amp;iacute;a para los 11.5 millones de inmigrantes indocumentados en los Estados Unidos. Establece una nueva base para la futura inmigraci&amp;amp;oacute;n legal reformando los sistemas basados en familia y empleo,&amp;amp;nbsp; y crea dos nuevos programas basados en m&amp;amp;eacute;ritos personales. 
 
Subt&amp;amp;iacute;tulo A. Creaci&amp;amp;oacute;n del Programa de&amp;amp;nbsp; Inmigrante Provisional Registrado
 
&amp;amp;middot;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp; Requisitos para Registrarse: Los inmigrantes quienes entraron a los Estados Unidos antes del 31 de diciembre del 2011 y han permanecido f&amp;amp;iacute;sicamente en el pa&amp;amp;iacute;s desde esa fecha calificaran para aplicar por el estatus de&amp;amp;nbsp; Inmigrante Provisional Registrado (RPI por sus siglas en ingl&amp;amp;eacute;s) siempre y cuando no tengan antecedentes penales, no hayan cometido cr&amp;amp;iacute;menes, paguen impuestos que debe, las cuotas necesarias, y una multa de $500 d&amp;amp;oacute;lares. 
 
&amp;amp;middot;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp; El Registro Inicial ser&amp;amp;aacute; v&amp;amp;aacute;lido por seis a&amp;amp;ntilde;os. Dara permiso de&amp;amp;nbsp; trabajo y autorizaci&amp;amp;oacute;n para viajar al exterior. Incluye a los c&amp;amp;oacute;nyuges e hijos que viven en Estados Unidos en la misma aplicaci&amp;amp;oacute;n. 
 
&amp;amp;middot;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp; Renovaci&amp;amp;oacute;n: Los individuos con estatus de RPI tendr&amp;amp;aacute;n que demostrar que no tienen antecedentes penales, pagar las cuotas necesarias, impuestos y una multa de $500 d&amp;amp;oacute;lares. Deber&amp;amp;aacute;n&amp;amp;nbsp; comprobar 1) que est&amp;amp;aacute;n empleados regularmente y que no ser&amp;amp;aacute;n una carga publica, o 2) que tienen recursos econ&amp;amp;oacute;micos mayores al 100 % del nivel de pobreza.
 
&amp;amp;middot;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp; Ajuste de Estatus a Residencia Permanente: Al t&amp;amp;eacute;rmino del periodo de 10 a&amp;amp;ntilde;os, los RPI podr&amp;amp;aacute;n aplicar para un ajuste de estatus, siempre y cuando puedan demostrar que: 1) son admisibles, 2) paguen un multa adicional de $1000 por adulto m&amp;amp;aacute;s una cuota de aplicaci&amp;amp;oacute;n; 3) demuestren que est&amp;amp;aacute;n aprendiendo a hablar Ingl&amp;amp;eacute;s; 4) paguen impuestos; 5) no tengan antecedentes penales y 6) demuestren que tienen empleo. Espec&amp;amp;iacute;ficamente, deben comprobar: 1) que han estado empleados regularmente y que no ser&amp;amp;aacute;n una carga p&amp;amp;uacute;blica o 2) que tienen recursos econ&amp;amp;oacute;micos mayores al 125% del&amp;amp;nbsp; nivel de pobreza. Bajo el sistema de inmigraci&amp;amp;oacute;n reformado, individuos que han vivido en los Estados Unidos bajo un estatus legal podr&amp;amp;aacute;n ajustar su estatus a residente permanente. Esto incluye a RPI y a otros inmigrantes legales. Los RPI podr&amp;amp;aacute;n aplicar para la naturalizaci&amp;amp;oacute;n despu&amp;amp;eacute;s de 3 a&amp;amp;ntilde;os adicionales, haciendo el camino a la ciudadan&amp;amp;iacute;a de un total de aproximadamente 13 a&amp;amp;ntilde;os. Este proyecto de ley requiere que los RPI&amp;amp;nbsp; se formen &apos;al final de la fila&apos;: Los RPI no pueden ajustar su estatus hasta que se procesen todas las peticiones familiares y de empleo actualmente siendo procesadas y que est&amp;amp;aacute;n en atrasadas.&amp;amp;nbsp; 
 
&amp;amp;middot;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp; Cronolog&amp;amp;iacute;a: El Departamento de Seguridad Interna&amp;amp;nbsp; tendr&amp;amp;aacute; 12 meses para promulgar reglamentos. Despu&amp;amp;eacute;s de estos 12 meses habr&amp;amp;aacute; un periodo de aplicaci&amp;amp;oacute;n de un a&amp;amp;ntilde;o el cual puede ser extendido hasta 18 meses adicionales por la Secretaria.&amp;amp;nbsp; 
 
&amp;amp;middot;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp; DREAM Act: Individuos quienes entraron a los Estados Unidos antes de los 16 a&amp;amp;ntilde;os y que han terminado la preparatoria u obtenido el GED en los Estados Unidos podr&amp;amp;aacute;n registrarse para recibir estatus de RPI mediante el DREAM ACT. No hay edad l&amp;amp;iacute;mite para este programa. Individuos quienes recibieron Acci&amp;amp;oacute;n Diferida para los Llegados en la Infancia (DACA por sus siglas en ingl&amp;amp;eacute;s) recibir&amp;amp;aacute;n estatus RPI autom&amp;amp;aacute;ticamente. Los DREAMers con estatus RPI estar&amp;amp;aacute;n excluidos de multas y de las condiciones de seguridad fronteriza. Cinco a&amp;amp;ntilde;os despu&amp;amp;eacute;s de su registro inicial, los DREAMers con estatus RPI podr&amp;amp;aacute;n aplicar por un ajuste de estatus; su tiempo bajo el estatus RPI contar&amp;amp;aacute; para el requisito de naturalizaci&amp;amp;oacute;n. Esto les permitir&amp;amp;aacute; convertirse en&amp;amp;nbsp; ciudadanos inmediatamente despu&amp;amp;eacute;s de recibir la residencia permanente. Los menores de 16 a&amp;amp;ntilde;os tendr&amp;amp;aacute;n un camino a la ciudadan&amp;amp;iacute;a de 5 a&amp;amp;ntilde;os y estar&amp;amp;aacute;n excluidos de ciertos requisitos. El proyecto de ley fortalecer&amp;amp;aacute; las protecciones de bienestar infantil y asegurar&amp;amp;aacute; que los padres no sean removidos basados solo en su estatus migratorio.&amp;amp;nbsp; 
 
&amp;amp;middot;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp; Programa Agr&amp;amp;iacute;cola: Trabajadores agr&amp;amp;iacute;colas que puedan demostrar que hayan trabajado un m&amp;amp;iacute;nimo de 100 d&amp;amp;iacute;as laborales o 575 horas en los dos a&amp;amp;ntilde;os antes de la adopci&amp;amp;oacute;n de este proyecto de ley, calificar&amp;amp;aacute;n para recibir un permiso de trabajo agr&amp;amp;iacute;cola. Los trabajadores agr&amp;amp;iacute;colas que trabajen un m&amp;amp;iacute;nimo de 100&amp;amp;nbsp; d&amp;amp;iacute;as al a&amp;amp;ntilde;o por cinco a&amp;amp;ntilde;os, o trabajadores que&amp;amp;nbsp; trabajen un m&amp;amp;iacute;nimo de 150 d&amp;amp;iacute;as al a&amp;amp;ntilde;o por tres a&amp;amp;ntilde;os, podr&amp;amp;aacute;n ajustar su estatus a residente permanente. Para calificar y poder recibir la residencia permanente, los trabajadores agr&amp;amp;iacute;colas deber&amp;amp;aacute;n comprobar que han pagado impuestos, que no tienen antecedentes penales, y deber&amp;amp;aacute;n pagar una multa de $400 d&amp;amp;oacute;lares. 
 
&amp;amp;middot;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp; Integraci&amp;amp;oacute;n: Se crear&amp;amp;aacute; la Oficina de Nuevos Estadounidenses, un grupo de ayuda para nuevos ciudadanos, e iniciativas adicionales para ayudar a inmigrantes a aprender Ingl&amp;amp;eacute;s, civismo, y a integrarse a sus comunidades locales. Proveer&amp;amp;aacute; financiamiento para ayudar a organizaciones sin fines de lucro y gobiernos locales a lanzar programas que ayuden a promover estas iniciativas. 
 
Subt&amp;amp;iacute;tulo B.&amp;amp;nbsp; Reformas a la Inmigraci&amp;amp;oacute;n Legal
 
&amp;amp;middot;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp; Nuevo Sistema Basado en M&amp;amp;eacute;ritos Personales: La &apos;primera v&amp;amp;iacute;a&apos; crea&amp;amp;nbsp; una visa basada en m&amp;amp;eacute;ritos personales y alocar&amp;amp;aacute; 120,000 visas anuales basadas en un sistema de puntaje con la posibilidad de aumentar por un 5% (hasta 250,000) en cualquier a&amp;amp;ntilde;o que el desempleo este abajo del 8.5%. Los puntos ser&amp;amp;aacute;n otorgados de acuerdo al nivel de educaci&amp;amp;oacute;n, tipo de empleo, si tiene familia en los Estados Unidos, y el tiempo de residencia en los Estado Unidos. La mitad de las visas basadas en m&amp;amp;eacute;ritos personales ser&amp;amp;aacute;n reservadas para individuos con alta capacitaci&amp;amp;oacute;n, y la otra mitad para trabajadores con baja capacitaci&amp;amp;oacute;n laboral. 
 
&amp;amp;middot;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp; Una Nueva &apos;Segunda V&amp;amp;iacute;a&apos; Basada en M&amp;amp;eacute;ritos Personales es creada para procesar todas las peticiones familiares y de empleo que est&amp;amp;eacute;n atrasadas. Adem&amp;amp;aacute;s,&amp;amp;nbsp;este sistema permite que individuos quienes han vivido legalmente en el pa&amp;amp;iacute;s por m&amp;amp;aacute;s de 10 a&amp;amp;ntilde;os con un permiso de trabajo puedan ajustar su estatus a residente permanente. 
 
&amp;amp;middot;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp; C&amp;amp;oacute;nyuges e hijos de Residentes Permanentes: Las categor&amp;amp;iacute;as familiares actuales ser&amp;amp;aacute;n modificadas para permitir a c&amp;amp;oacute;nyuges e hijos de residentes permanentes inmigrar al pa&amp;amp;iacute;s inmediatamente. 
 
&amp;amp;middot;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp; Cambios Adicionales al Sistema Familiar Actual: La categor&amp;amp;iacute;a de hermanos ser&amp;amp;aacute; eliminada 18 meses despu&amp;amp;eacute;s de la adopci&amp;amp;oacute;n de esta ley. La tercer categor&amp;amp;iacute;a de preferencia familiar (hijos adultos casados de ciudadanos Estadounidenses) tendr&amp;amp;aacute;&amp;amp;nbsp; l&amp;amp;iacute;mite de 31 a&amp;amp;ntilde;os de edad 18 meses despu&amp;amp;eacute;s de la adopci&amp;amp;oacute;n de esta ley. El programa de reducci&amp;amp;oacute;n de atrasos incluir&amp;amp;aacute; el proceso de peticiones hechas en las categor&amp;amp;iacute;as que ser&amp;amp;aacute;n eliminadas. Ciudadanos Estadounidenses podr&amp;amp;aacute;n reclamar a hermanos hasta 18 meses despu&amp;amp;eacute;s de la adopci&amp;amp;oacute;n de esta ley.&amp;amp;nbsp; 
 
&amp;amp;middot;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp; Nueva Visa Familiar &apos;V&apos;: Crea una nueva visa no-migrante para familiares cuyas peticiones para recibir la residencia permanente hayan sido aprobadas. Estos individuos podr&amp;amp;aacute;n vivir y trabajar en los Estado Unidos mientras que esperan recibir su tarjeta de residencia. Tambi&amp;amp;eacute;n autoriza la visita de familiares, incluyendo hermanos, a los Estados Unidos por hasta 60 d&amp;amp;iacute;as al a&amp;amp;ntilde;o.&amp;amp;nbsp; 
 
&amp;amp;middot;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp; Reformas Basadas en Empleo: C&amp;amp;oacute;nyuges e hijos de solicitantes de visas basadas en empleo, graduados en ciencia, tecnolog&amp;amp;iacute;a, ingenier&amp;amp;iacute;a, y matem&amp;amp;aacute;tica (STEM por sus siglas en ingl&amp;amp;eacute;s), ciertos profesionistas, y algunos m&amp;amp;eacute;dicos estar&amp;amp;aacute;n excluidos del l&amp;amp;iacute;mite del n&amp;amp;uacute;mero de visas. El l&amp;amp;iacute;mite del n&amp;amp;uacute;mero de visas para trabajadores de baja calificaci&amp;amp;oacute;n laboral ser&amp;amp;aacute; elevado. 
 
&amp;amp;middot;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp; Reducci&amp;amp;oacute;n de Atrasos Adicionales y Mejoras: Provisiones adicionales para el proceso r&amp;amp;aacute;pido y la reducci&amp;amp;oacute;n de atrasos incluir&amp;amp;aacute; la eliminaci&amp;amp;oacute;n de l&amp;amp;iacute;mites a peticiones basadas en empleo y pa&amp;amp;iacute;s, un incremento de&amp;amp;nbsp; l&amp;amp;iacute;mites de pa&amp;amp;iacute;ses basado en familia, y la recaptura de n&amp;amp;uacute;meros de visas no usadas. Los programas populares para doctores extranjeros (Conrad-30), reclutamiento de trabajadores religiosos, y el EB-5 para inversionistas quedan permanentemente reautorizados. Otras mejoras t&amp;amp;eacute;cnicas para&amp;amp;nbsp; la modernizaci&amp;amp;oacute;n de los programas de visas est&amp;amp;aacute;n incluidos (protecciones adicionales para hijastros, viudas y otros familiares.)
 
&amp;amp;middot;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp; Discreci&amp;amp;oacute;n Judicial: Expande la autoridad de los jueces de inmigraci&amp;amp;oacute;n y DHS para conceder excepciones de deportaci&amp;amp;oacute;n por razones humanitarias. 
 
T&amp;amp;iacute;tulo III.&amp;amp;nbsp; Aplicaci&amp;amp;oacute;n de la Ley Interna.
 
Este t&amp;amp;iacute;tulo ordena el uso obligatorio del E-Verify,&amp;amp;nbsp; crea protecciones adicionales para trabajadores, reforma el sistema legal migratorio y establece medidas adicionales para asegurar el cumplimiento de la nueva ley en el interior de pa&amp;amp;iacute;s. 
 
&amp;amp;middot;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp; Fase E-Verify De Cinco A&amp;amp;ntilde;os: El sistema electr&amp;amp;oacute;nico de verificaci&amp;amp;oacute;n de empleo (E-Verify) cubrir&amp;amp;aacute; a todos los trabajadores Estadounidenses, comenzando con contratistas federales y empleadores de infraestructura cr&amp;amp;iacute;tica, en un periodo de 5 a&amp;amp;ntilde;os. Requiere verificaci&amp;amp;oacute;n de identidad por medio de documentos a prueba de fraude.&amp;amp;nbsp; Y especialmente proh&amp;amp;iacute;be la creaci&amp;amp;oacute;n de una tarjeta de identificaci&amp;amp;oacute;n nacional.
 
&amp;amp;middot;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp; Medidas Anti-fraude: Expande las protecciones contra el fraude de n&amp;amp;uacute;mero de Seguro Social. Permite a empleados bloquear su n&amp;amp;uacute;mero de Seguro Social, y da a los empleadores acceso al historial de E-Verify personal de sus trabajadores. Provee una expansi&amp;amp;oacute;n del mecanismo de identificaci&amp;amp;oacute;n de fotos de E-Verify y alienta a los estados que proporcione fotos al DHS. 
 
&amp;amp;middot;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp; Proceso Legal: Expande protecciones de proceso legal para prevenir que trabajadores legales sean negados acceso a trabajos por negligencia de los empleadores o errores en el sistema. Provee pagos retroactivos para trabajadores que hayan perdido su trabajo por errores en el sistema o de empleadores. Provee a trabajadores un periodo de estancia despu&amp;amp;eacute;s de perder su empleo para que el trabajador corrija cualquier error en el sistema. 
 
&amp;amp;middot;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp; Protecciones Laborales: Incluye protecciones para empleados y empleadores, incluyendo leyes de verificaci&amp;amp;oacute;n estatales,&amp;amp;nbsp; la expansi&amp;amp;oacute;n de visas U en situaciones de abuso laboral, y financiamiento de programas laborales. Tambi&amp;amp;eacute;n toma medidas en contra del abuso de contrataci&amp;amp;oacute;n laboral.
 
&amp;amp;middot;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp; Temas Sobre Refugiados/ Asilos: Agiliza el proceso&amp;amp;nbsp;en casos de refugio y asilo, y elimina la fecha l&amp;amp;iacute;mite de aplicaci&amp;amp;oacute;n de un a&amp;amp;ntilde;o. Elimina las barreras de reunificaci&amp;amp;oacute;n familiar para refugiados, autoriza el proceso r&amp;amp;aacute;pido de ciertos grupos de refugiados de alto riesgo, autoriza que agentes extiendan asilo a solicitantes durante entrevistas de asilo, y permite que individuos despatriados apliquen para recibir la residencia permanente. 
 
&amp;amp;middot;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp; Mejoras a Tribunales de Inmigraci&amp;amp;oacute;n: Autoriza el incremento del n&amp;amp;uacute;mero de personal en los tribunales de inmigraci&amp;amp;oacute;n, recursos adicionales, y entrenamiento adicional para jueces y otro personal migratorio; el acceso a consejo legal para poblaciones vulnerables para el mejoramiento y la eficiencia de los tribunales, y codifica permanentemente el Consejo de Apelaciones Migratorias, y programas de orientaci&amp;amp;oacute;n legal. 
 
&amp;amp;middot;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp; Legislaci&amp;amp;oacute;n Interna: Endurece ciertas normas de inadmisibilidad relacionadas con fraude de pasaportes y documentos legales, si el individuo haya sido encontrado culpable de manejar bajo la influencia del alcohol m&amp;amp;aacute;s de 3 veces, culpable de estar involucrado con pandillas, culpable de violencia dom&amp;amp;eacute;stica, abuso infantil, acecho, la violaci&amp;amp;oacute;n de &amp;amp;oacute;rdenes de protecci&amp;amp;oacute;n, y por no registrarse como agresor sexual. Proh&amp;amp;iacute;be y/o incrementa las sanciones contra el contrabando, entradas ilegales al pa&amp;amp;iacute;s, y re-ingreso. Crea un sistema de verificaci&amp;amp;oacute;n de salida del pa&amp;amp;iacute;s obligatorio.&amp;amp;nbsp; 
 
&amp;amp;middot;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp; Reforma de Detenci&amp;amp;oacute;n: Incrementa la supervisi&amp;amp;oacute;n de centros de detenci&amp;amp;oacute;n,&amp;amp;nbsp;otorga la capacidad a jueces de inmigraci&amp;amp;oacute;n para dirigir audiencias de fianza, y expande alternativas a la detenci&amp;amp;oacute;n. 
 
T&amp;amp;iacute;tulo IV. Reformas a los Programas No-Migrantes.
 
Este t&amp;amp;iacute;tulo reforma los programas de visas no-migrantes y crea una nueva visa que une la flexibilidad de trabajo y protecciones laborales con la oportunidad de aplicar para la residencia permanente. 
 
&amp;amp;middot;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp; H-1B: Cambios al programa de visas H-1B para trabajadores de alta capacitaci&amp;amp;oacute;n incluir&amp;amp;aacute; el incremento del n&amp;amp;uacute;mero de visas de 65,000 a 110,000 con la opci&amp;amp;oacute;n de incrementar a hasta 180,000 visas anuales basados en el&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;Iacute;ndice de Demanda de Empleos de Alta Capacitaci&amp;amp;oacute;n. &amp;amp;nbsp;Permite la autorizaci&amp;amp;oacute;n de trabajo para c&amp;amp;oacute;nyuges e hijos. Incrementa los requerimientos de contrataci&amp;amp;oacute;n&amp;amp;nbsp;y oferta de empleos a trabajadores Estadounidenses antes de poder contratar trabajadores extranjeros. Incrementa multas y requerimientos de salarios para compa&amp;amp;ntilde;&amp;amp;iacute;as que usan visas H-1B excesivamente. Despu&amp;amp;eacute;s de 3 a&amp;amp;ntilde;os, si hay compa&amp;amp;ntilde;&amp;amp;iacute;as que emplean a m&amp;amp;aacute;s del 50% de su fuerza laboral por medio de visas H1-B quedar&amp;amp;aacute;n descalificadas del programa. 
 
&amp;amp;middot;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp; Prevenci&amp;amp;oacute;n de Abuso: Establece nuevas medidas y multas para prevenir, detectar, y disuadir fraude y abuso de los sistemas de visas H-1B y L-1 por empleadores fraudulentos.
 
&amp;amp;middot;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp; H-2B: Hace al programa de visas H-2B permanente. 
 
&amp;amp;middot;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp; Programa de Trabajadores Nuevo (W Visa): Establece una nueva clasificaci&amp;amp;oacute;n no-inmigrante para trabajadores de baja capacitaci&amp;amp;oacute;n realizando servicios o labores para un empleador registrado. Los c&amp;amp;oacute;nyuges e hijos est&amp;amp;aacute;n incluidos y est&amp;amp;aacute;n autorizados para trabajar. Esta visa dura 3 a&amp;amp;ntilde;os y tiene un periodo de renovaci&amp;amp;oacute;n de 3 a&amp;amp;ntilde;os. Inicialmente, se otorgar&amp;amp;aacute; 20,000 W visas y se incrementar&amp;amp;aacute; ese n&amp;amp;uacute;mero a 75,000 en cuatro a&amp;amp;ntilde;os. Este programa podr&amp;amp;aacute; incrementar el n&amp;amp;uacute;mero de visas otorgadas hasta 200,000 dependiendo en una f&amp;amp;oacute;rmula que incluye el nivel de desempleo, oportunidades laborales, n&amp;amp;uacute;mero de aplicaciones, y las recomendaciones del nuevo Buro de Inmigraci&amp;amp;oacute;n y de Investigaci&amp;amp;oacute;n del Mercado Laboral. Empleadores que tengan escaseces en su &amp;amp;aacute;rea laboral podr&amp;amp;aacute;n contratar trabajadores inmigrantes aunque las visas se agoten. Visados podr&amp;amp;aacute;n cambiar de empleador sin tener que pagar multa alguna y podr&amp;amp;aacute;n aplicar para el programa de residencia permanente basado en m&amp;amp;eacute;ritos personales o de empleo. 
 
&amp;amp;middot;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp; Agricultura: Establece una nuevo programa de visas para trabajadores agr&amp;amp;iacute;colas para proveer una base laboral agr&amp;amp;iacute;cola m&amp;amp;aacute;s estable. Crear&amp;amp;iacute;a una visa de trabajo portable sin empleador espec&amp;amp;iacute;fico (W-3 visa) y una visa de trabajo con empleador espec&amp;amp;iacute;fico (W-2). &amp;amp;Eacute;stas visas ser&amp;amp;aacute;n administradas por el Departamento de Agricultura y remplazar&amp;amp;aacute;n el programa actual del H-2 A. Provee un proceso r&amp;amp;aacute;pido&amp;amp;nbsp;para la petici&amp;amp;oacute;n de trabajadores agr&amp;amp;iacute;colas y al mismo tiempo establece protecciones laborales. El programa H-2 A ser&amp;amp;aacute; desmantelado una vez que el nuevo programa de visas para trabajadores agr&amp;amp;iacute;colas este completamente en funci&amp;amp;oacute;n. 
 
&amp;amp;middot;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp; Visa para Empresarios: Este proyecto crea una nueva visa para empresarios extranjeros quienes deseen inmigrar a los Estados Unidos para fundar sus compa&amp;amp;ntilde;&amp;amp;iacute;as. &amp;amp;Eacute;sta visa tiene una duraci&amp;amp;oacute;n de 3 a&amp;amp;ntilde;os y est&amp;amp;aacute; disponible para empresarios que puedan demostrar apoyo de un inversionista en los Estados Unidos, y tiene par&amp;amp;aacute;metros que reflejen el n&amp;amp;uacute;mero de empleos e ingresos que puedan generar.</description>
			<link>http://www.dpcc.senate.gov/?p=news&amp;id=236</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 04:15:00 EST</pubDate>
			
		</item>
	
		<item>
			<title>Independent Experts and Fact-Checkers Agree: GOP Wrong to Claim Background Checks Can Lead to a Federal Gun Registry</title>
			<description>ACROSS THE BOARD, FACT CHECKERS SLAM GOP CLAIMS OF FEDERAL GUN REGISTRY
Fact Check.Org: Gun Rights Group&apos;s Aim Is Way Off
 
 
Washington Post Fact Checker: Four Pinnochios 
 
 
Time Magazine: Fact Check: The Gun Registry Red Herring
 
 
National Journal: &apos;Wrong&apos;
NATIONAL GUN REGISTRY PROHIBITED BY MANCHIN-TOOMEY AND FEDERAL LAW
Huffington Post: &apos;The background check compromise set to be introduced on Thursday will explicitly bar public officials from creating a national gun registry, penalizing those who do with a charge carrying a prison sentence of up to 15 years.&apos; [Huffington Post, 4/11/13]
&apos;No such rule or regulation prescribed after the date of the enactment of the Firearms Owners&apos; Protection Act may require that records required to be maintained under this chapter or any portion of the contents of such records, be recorded at or transferred to a facility owned, managed, or controlled by the United States or any State or any political subdivision thereof, nor that any system of registration of firearms, firearms owners, or firearms transactions or dispositions be established.&apos; [18 USC Title 18 Part I Chapter 44, Sec 926]
FBI Fact Sheet: &apos;The NICS is not to be used to establish a federal firearm registry; information about an inquiry resulting in an allowed transfer is destroyed in accordance with NICS regulations.&apos; [FBI Fact Sheet]
INDEPENDENT FIGURES: FEARS OF NATIONAL REGISTRY &apos;JUST PARANOID&apos;
National Review Deputy Managing Editor Kevin Williamson: &apos;There&apos;s a law saying we can&apos;t have a national firearm&apos;s registry, but there&apos;s a law that says that.&apos; [MSNBC, 4/10/13]
Third Way: Federal gun registry is &apos;not possible-practically, legally, or politically.&apos; [Third Way, 2/13]
Associated Press: &apos;The NRA is the best-known of the gun-rights groups, but others make waves, too. The National Association for Gun Rights has aired ads claiming that prominent Republicans including House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, R-Va. helped Obama create a national gun registry, an assertion that independent groups call false.&apos; [AP, 4/11/13]
Time Magazine: &apos;To be clear, there is no national gun registry. The federal government keeps no records from background checks that could be used to create a gun registry. In fact, federal law prohibits the creation of a national gun registry, and the bipartisan agreement to expand background checks specifically states that it is a crime to create a gun registry.&apos; [Time, 4/11/13]
Bloomberg: &apos;Federal law prohibits the creation of a national gun registry.&apos; [Bloomberg, 3/21/13]
Gun Store Owner/NRA Member Joe Deaser: &apos;I haven&apos;t talked to anybody who isn&apos;t behind this,&apos; he said, calling the argument that it would lead to a national gun registry &apos;just paranoid.&apos; [Bloomberg, 3/21/13]
ABC Nightline Anchor Terry Moran: ROVE: Then stop scaring people. Don&apos;t say we&apos;re going to keep a registry of all of these guns, and...ROVE: ...and let&apos;s not make it so unhappy...(CROSSTALK)MORAN: Stop scaring people? You&apos;re scaring people with this Orwellian sense that black helicopters and the government, if we register guns, they&apos;re going to confiscate Americans guns. [ABC This Week, 3/24/13]

Former RNC Chairman Michael Steele: &apos;I don&apos;t get the fear of registration,&apos; Steele said on MSNBC. &apos;I don&apos;t get the, the concern about trafficking. Are we saying that we want criminals to, you know, make ... back-alley sales out of the trunks of their cars?&apos; [TPM, 4/9/13]</description>
			<link>http://www.dpcc.senate.gov/?p=blog&amp;id=232</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 16:00:00 EST</pubDate>
			
		</item>
	
		<item>
			<title>They Deserve a Vote</title>
			<description>Republican Senators Refuse to Talk About Their Filibuster of Gun Legislation
McCain: &apos;What Are We Afraid Of?&apos; 
Scarborough: &apos;Is Anybody Awake In My Party On The Hill?&apos;

REPUBLICANS REFUSE TO TALK ABOUT THEIR FILIBUSTER ON GUNS 
CBS Reporter Nancy Cordes: &apos;We asked all fourteen Republican Senators for an interview about their filibuster threat but none of them were available.&apos; [CBS, 4/9/13]
KEY REPUBLICAN SENATORS: GUN LEGISLATION DESERVES A VOTE
Sen. Dean Heller (R-NV): 
&apos;I want to have that discussion. Now is the time.&apos; [Las Vegas Review Journal, 4/9/13]
Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK): 
&apos;Sure, I&apos;ll vote [to begin debate].&apos; [TPM, 4/9/13]
Sen. Saxby Chambliss (R-GA): 
Spokeswoman: &apos;He does not support the underlying committee bill, but he thinks a full debate on the issue will be healthy.&apos; [Atlanta Journal Constitution, 4/9/13]
Sen. Roy Blunt (R-MO):&amp;amp;nbsp; 
New York Times Reporter John Weisman: &apos;Blunt on gun filibuster: We&apos;re better off to debate these bills and u always have to 60 vote standard as to whether to go to the final vote.&apos; [NY Times, 4/9/13]
Sen. Johnny Isakson (R-GA)
&apos;There&apos;s  no -- there&apos;s was no ambivalence on the gun issue. I think, everybody  knows what the issues are. We have not seen the final draft of the  legislation that was produced, I understand, last night. But, I think,  it deserves a vote up or down.&apos; [CBS, 4/9/13]
Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME): 
CNN Reporter Deirdre Walsh: Sen Susan Collins said she does not support filibuster on bringing up gun bill, said if they get votes on amendments, will vote to proceed. [CNN, 4/9/13]
Sen. Pat Toomey (R-PA):
Allentown Morning Call: &apos;Featured was former Gov. Ed Rendell who told the crowd that he&apos;d spoken to Toomey and that the senator would not be supporting a filibuster.&apos; [Morning Call, 4/9/13]
Sen. Jeff Flake (R-AZ): 
CNN Reporter Deirdre Walsh: Sen Flake said as long as gets votes on amend he&apos;ll vote for motion to proceed on guns. [CNN, 4/9/13]
Sen. Kelly Ayotte (R-NH): 
 
&apos;Andrea, I don&apos;t support a filibuster for this. I believe that there should be provided that there are amendments, and that we can have a full and robust debate and I think that&apos;s the way to go forward on an important issue.&apos; [MSNBC, 4/9/13]
Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) 
SCHIEFFER: So you&apos;d encourage Republicans not to filibuster.
MCCAIN: I would not only encourage it. I don&apos;t understand it. What are we afraid of? Why would we not want, if this issue is as important as all of us think it is, why not take it on the world&apos;s greatest deliberative--that&apos;s the greatest exaggeration in history, by the way--but, you know, why not take it up an amendment and debate. The American people will profit from it. I do not understand why United States senators want to block debate when the leader has said that we can have amendments. [Face the Nation, 4/7/13]
Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) 
CROWLEY: Senator Inhofe and Senator Rubio have now joined in that filibuster threat. What do you make of it? Would you join it?
GRAHAM: Well, I&apos;d like to have an open process. The only way I would filibuster a bill is if Senator Reid did not allow alternative amendments. [CNN State of the Union, 3/31/13]
 
Sen. Mark Kirk (R-IL) [Washington Post, 4/9/13]
REPUBLICAN OPINION MAKERS: &apos;WE ARE IN DEEP TROUBLE&apos; IF WE FILIBUSTER GUNS LEGISLATION... &apos;IS ANYBODY AWAKE IN MY PARTY ON THE HILL?&apos;
Rep. Peter King (R-NY) &amp;amp;nbsp;
&apos;I would say its wrong. I would say we should have universal background checks but even if I did not support that legislation I would say let that come to debate. [CNN, 4/9/13]
Joe Scarborough
&apos;The Republicans are going to filibuster a 92% issue. Here in our latest poll it was 87%. Basically a 90-10 in something that involves the massacre of 20 first grade children. Is anybody awake in my party on the hill?&apos; [MSNBC, 4/9/13]
Former NRCC Chairman Tom Davis (R-VA)
&apos;If [the gun] issue is killed in filibuster then we are in deep trouble.&apos; [Washington Post, 4/8/13]
&amp;amp;nbsp;</description>
			<link>http://www.dpcc.senate.gov/?p=blog&amp;id=230</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 13:00:00 EST</pubDate>
			
		</item>
	
		<item>
			<title>Will Senate Republicans Allow a Vote on Gun Safety?</title>
			<description>View larger image here.</description>
			<link>http://www.dpcc.senate.gov/?p=blog&amp;id=231</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 11:46:00 EST</pubDate>
			<enclosure url="http://www.dpcc.senate.gov/files/images/DPCCWillRsAllowVoteonGunSafetySmall.jpg" type="image/jpeg" />
		</item>
	
		<item>
			<title>Who Agrees With Expanding Background Checks For Gun Purchases?</title>
			<description>91% OF AMERICA&apos;S VOTERS:
Qunnipiac Poll: 91% of Voters Support Background Checks.&amp;amp;nbsp;  91 % of voters support universal gun background checks, including 88% of voters in households with guns. 
&amp;amp;nbsp;
74% OF NRA MEMBERS:
&amp;amp;nbsp;
Johns Hopkins: 74% of NRA Members Support Expanding Background Checks. 84% of gun-owners and 74% of NRA members support requiring a universal background-check system for all gun sales.
&amp;amp;nbsp;
HUNTERS &amp;amp;amp; GUN STORE OWNERS:

&amp;amp;nbsp;Bull Moose Sportsmen&apos;s Alliance Gaspar Perricone: &apos;We believe background checks fall within an ethic of responsible gun ownership sportsmen have been living and teaching for generations.&apos;
&amp;amp;nbsp;Capital Gun Club Owner Joe Deaser: &apos;In order to do just that, my fellow gun owners must come together to support perhaps the most logical and pragmatic gun safety measure currently under consideration in Washington: expanding the existing background check system to require criminal background checks for each and every gun sale.&apos; 
&amp;amp;nbsp;
LEADING SENATE REPUBLICANS:
&amp;amp;nbsp;
Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK): &amp;amp;nbsp;&apos;I&apos;m for enhanced background checks because it&apos;s a way for you to go online to make sure you&apos;re not selling your gun to someone you wouldn&apos;t want to have it.&apos; 
&amp;amp;nbsp;
Sen. Dean Heller (R-NV): Mr. Heller said that the group &apos;is a group that I respect,&apos; adding that he believed Congress &apos;should expand background checks,&apos; but had declined to support a bill with Mr. Schumer.
&amp;amp;nbsp;
Sen. Pat Toomey (R-PA): &apos;And, so I&apos;m in favor of making changes to a background system if I believe that it would help to reduce the likelihood that a person who shouldn&apos;t have access to a gun doesn&apos;t get access to a gun.&apos; 
Sen. Jeff Flake (R-AZ): &apos;I think there likely will be with regards to background checks. All of us, Republicans and Democrats, have recognized that we need more effective and broader background checks than we&apos;ve had in the past.&apos; 

Sen. John McCain (R-AZ): 
QUESTION: Are you prepared at least to support universal background checks, if that&apos;s all that comes outta this, would you be support-- prepared to support that?
MCCAIN: There&apos;s-- some Senators, bipartisan again-- Senator Coburn and Senator Manchin and some others who are working on a package that I think that most of us will be able to support. I applaud their efforts and obviously we want to do everything we can to prevent guns from falling into the hands of people who are mentally unbalanced or criminals. 
Sen. Johnny Isakson (R-GA): &apos;I believe that more effective and sensible solutions are those that focus on background checks and mental health care, rather than restrictions on our Second Amendment right to bear arms.&apos; 
&amp;amp;nbsp;
Sen. Roy Blunt (R-MO):
QUESTION: What&apos;s wrong with the idea of a screen to find out whether or not someone trying to buy a gun under any circumstances has a criminal record, has a mental health problem?
BLUNT: I think we ought to talk about that.
&amp;amp;nbsp;
Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME): &apos;Nevertheless, we should examine, among other issues, whether states are reporting data on mentally ill individuals found to be a danger to themselves or others to the national background check database designed to prevent gun purchases by such individuals.&amp;amp;nbsp; During my tenure in the Senate, I have voted for instant background checks, which are designed to prevent individuals with criminal records or serious mental illness from purchasing guns.&apos;
 
NRA PRESIDENT WAYNE LaPIERRE IN 1999: 
 
 
NRA President Wayne LaPierre: &apos;We think it &apos;s reasonable to provide mandatory instant criminal  background checks for every sale at every gun show. No loopholes  anywhere for anyone.&apos;
 
LEADING HOUSE REPUBLICANS:
&amp;amp;nbsp;
Rep. Joe Heck (R-NV): &apos;I think the idea of background checks across the board, I&apos;m not opposed to them,&apos; Heck said. &apos;I disagree with people who say that this is going to be the first step to gun registration, which leads to gun confiscation.&apos; 
&amp;amp;nbsp;
Rep. Mike Fitzpatrick (R-PA): &apos;It is imperative that we close the loopholes and fix the nation&apos;s background-check system.&apos; 
&amp;amp;nbsp;
Rep. Pat Meehan (R-PA): &apos;I agree with the president that we can and should strengthen the nation&apos;s background-check system.&apos; 
&amp;amp;nbsp;
Rep. Phil Gingrey (R-GA): Gingrey, who took the time to praise Adventure Outdoors owner Jay Wallace as the gold standard for running a responsible gun retail business, said he is also open to revisions of the so-called gun show loophole. &apos;What it is basically, if you go to a gun show and there&apos;s somebody out there in the parking lot, and they&apos;re getting out of their car, and they&apos;ve got an A-15 on their shoulder or .... John Q. Public wants to sell a handgun or whatever, then there&apos;s no background check,&apos; Gingrey said. &apos;You know, you&apos;re buying a used weapon from somebody and then basically no background check.&apos; 
&amp;amp;nbsp;</description>
			<link>http://www.dpcc.senate.gov/?p=blog&amp;id=228</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 10:00:00 EST</pubDate>
			<enclosure url="http://www.dpcc.senate.gov/files/images/DPCC91PercentofVotersBackgroundChecks.JPG" type="image/jpeg" />
		</item>
	
		<item>
			<title>Democratic Budget vs. Republican Budget</title>
			<description></description>
			<link>http://www.dpcc.senate.gov/?p=blog&amp;id=227</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 20:50:00 EST</pubDate>
			<enclosure url="http://www.dpcc.senate.gov/files/images/DPCCTax BreakCompare01.png" type="image/jpeg" />
		</item>
	
		<item>
			<title>State-by-State Impact of Republican Budget on Women</title>
			<description>Senate Democrats have introduced a budget that cuts wasteful spending, invests in what the economy needs to grow, and protects programs critical to women across the country. Meanwhile, Republicans have again introduced a budget that would take an enormous toll on the nation&apos;s women, cutting the services they rely on for their health and the health of their children. Click below to see how the Republican budget would be harmful to women in your state:
Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut D.C. Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming</description>
			<link>http://www.dpcc.senate.gov/?p=press_release&amp;id=226</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 16:56:00 EST</pubDate>
			
		</item>
	
		</channel>
	</rss>
